35 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,853 times   601 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
  2. First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan

    514 U.S. 938 (1995)   Cited 5,478 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.

    500 U.S. 20 (1991)   Cited 3,053 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration
  4. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Waffle House, Inc.

    534 U.S. 279 (2002)   Cited 1,505 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private arbitration agreement between an employee and an employer could not bind a nonparty governmental agency, the EEOC, and thus that the agreement—which was enforceable against the employee under the Federal Arbitration Act—did not limit the types of remedies the agency could seek in an enforcement action it initiated under Title VII
  5. Shearson/Am. Express Inc. v. McMahon

    482 U.S. 220 (1987)   Cited 1,813 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding RICO claims arbitrable and citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 636-37, 105 S.Ct. 3346, 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (holding antitrust claims arbitrable because, even if they are arbitrated, antitrust law "will continue to serve both its remedial and deterrent function")
  6. Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest.

    570 U.S. 228 (2013)   Cited 662 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a class waiver in an arbitration agreement is enforceable under the FAA even when a plaintiff shows that the waiver will prevent her from vindicating her statutory rights
  7. American Pipe Construction Co. v. Utah

    414 U.S. 538 (1974)   Cited 2,141 times   162 Legal Analyses
    Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"
  8. Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Epstein

    516 U.S. 367 (1996)   Cited 529 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Exchange Act's exclusive-jurisdiction provision sought "to achieve greater uniformity of construction and more effective and expert application of that law"
  9. BG Grp. PLC v. Republic of Argentina

    572 U.S. 25 (2014)   Cited 290 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is presumed that parties intend for the courts, not arbitrators, to decide disputes about "arbitrability," such as "whether an arbitration clause in a concededly binding contract applies to a particular type of controversy"
  10. Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood

    565 U.S. 95 (2012)   Cited 275 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contract “parties remain free to specify” their choice of judicial forum “so long as the guarantee ” of the Act “is preserved.”
  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,573 times   1241 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  12. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  13. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,068 times   210 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
  14. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 11,110 times   119 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"
  15. Section 4 - Failure to arbitrate under agreement; petition to United States court having jurisdiction for order to compel arbitration; notice and service thereof; hearing and determination

    9 U.S.C. § 4   Cited 6,520 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to federal courts to compel party to participate in arbitration where a valid arbitration agreement exists
  16. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,081 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
  17. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,291 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity
  18. Section 102 - Public policy in labor matters declared

    29 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 150 times
    Declaring public policy underlying Norris-LaGuardia
  19. Section 103 - Nonenforceability of undertakings in conflict with public policy; "yellow dog" contracts

    29 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 31 times

    Any undertaking or promise, such as is described in this section, or any other undertaking or promise in conflict with the public policy declared in section 102 of this title, is declared to be contrary to the public policy of the United States, shall not be enforceable in any court of the United States and shall not afford any basis for the granting of legal or equitable relief by any such court, including specifically the following: Every undertaking or promise hereafter made, whether written or

  20. Section 8-4-103 - Payment of wages - insufficient funds - pay statement - record retention - gratuity notification - penalties

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-4-103   Cited 18 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Stating that wages or compensation earned by any employee are promptly due