10 Cited authorities

Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
439 U.S. 322 (1979) Cited 4,231 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair
MedellÍn v. Texas
552 U.S. 491 (2008) Cited 486 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that President George W. Bush's memorandum in response to an international court's decision was "not a rule of domestic law binding in state and federal courts"
Lindsey v. Normet
405 U.S. 56 (1972) Cited 784 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing
Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
974 F. Supp. 2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) Cited 73 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that private injunctive relief is available in civil federal RICO actions
In re Veiga
746 F. Supp. 2d 8 (D.D.C. 2010) Cited 48 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding lack of geographic limitation caused fourth Intel factor to weigh against applicant
Underhill v. Hernandez
168 U.S. 250 (1897) Cited 314 times
Holding that the act of state doctrine bars courts from considering claims for false arrest when the actions were conducted by military personnel in service to the government
Republic of Ecuador v. Connor
708 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 2013) Cited 20 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that party judicially estopped from arguing that a specific international tribunal was not subject to discovery statute, where party had repeatedly argued same tribunal was subject to same statute before other courts
Blue Angel Films v. First Look Studios, Inc.
08 Civ. 6469 (DAB)(JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2013) Cited 1 times
Adopting report and recommendation
Section 636 - Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636 Cited 498,671 times 39 Legal Analyses
Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"
Section 1782 - Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals
28 U.S.C. § 1782 Cited 2,076 times 247 Legal Analyses
In § 1782, Congress has expressly authorized federal courts to order discovery from domestic persons in aid of foreign proceedings like the ongoing Polish prosecution.

v. Carrion et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair

Holding that President George W. Bush's memorandum in response to an international court's decision was "not a rule of domestic law binding in state and federal courts"

Holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing

Holding that private injunctive relief is available in civil federal RICO actions

Finding lack of geographic limitation caused fourth Intel factor to weigh against applicant

Holding that the act of state doctrine bars courts from considering claims for false arrest when the actions were conducted by military personnel in service to the government

Holding that party judicially estopped from arguing that a specific international tribunal was not subject to discovery statute, where party had repeatedly argued same tribunal was subject to same statute before other courts

Adopting report and recommendation

Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"

In § 1782, Congress has expressly authorized federal courts to order discovery from domestic persons in aid of foreign proceedings like the ongoing Polish prosecution.