§Why CasetextPricing

USA v. Wang

OPPOSITION to Defendant's Motions to Suppress Evidence [18],[19] and Motion to Dismiss Count Six of the Indictment [20]

14 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Leon

    468 U.S. 897 (1984)   Cited 10,306 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a warrant is "subsequently invalidated," suppression is not necessary so long as the warrant was issued by a neutral magistrate and the officers' reliance on the warrant was objectively reasonable

  2. United States v. Nosal

    676 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 207 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the CFAA does not extend to violations of [employee] use restrictions," where employee used information from employer's computer to set up competing company

  3. United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.

    568 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 162 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, as "a matter of substantive Fourth Amendment law," a person challenging a search or seizure must show that there has been a violation of that Amendment "as to him, personally" (simplified)

  4. United States v. Kow

    58 F.3d 423 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 169 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a warrant was defective because, among other shortcomings, it "did not limit the scope of the seizure to a time frame within which the suspected criminal activity took place"

  5. U.S. v. Luong

    470 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 99 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding no suppression because the affidavit established "at least a colorable argument for probable cause"

  6. United States v. Grant

    682 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 55 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding affidavit did not support the inference that the defendant possessed the murder weapon at some point, much less that he brought the gun to the appellant's home two months before the search was executed

  7. United States v. Tan Duc Nguyen

    673 F.3d 1259 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 40 times
    Concluding that there was a fair probability that the wide distribution of a letter to Latino immigrants warning “that if they voted in the upcoming election their personal information would be collected” and could be provided to anti-immigration organizations constituted unlawful intimidation under California law

  8. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 23,926 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  9. Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

    18 U.S.C. § 371   Cited 21,529 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"

  10. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,363 times   304 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements

  11. Section 1028A - Aggravated identity theft

    18 U.S.C. § 1028A   Cited 3,485 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Requiring sentence be served consecutively to any other sentence and prohibiting courts from placing defendants convicted under this provision on probation

  12. Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

    18 U.S.C. § 1030   Cited 3,251 times   408 Legal Analyses
    Holding cellular phones are protected

  13. Section 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents

    18 U.S.C. § 1546   Cited 1,245 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement in immigration documents

  14. Section 214.3 - Certification and recertification of schools for enrollment of F and M nonimmigrants

    8 C.F.R. § 214.3   Cited 29 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring schools to report immediately to the INS those students who terminated their attendance or took too few units