92 Cited authorities

Griffin v. California
380 U.S. 609 (1965) Cited 4,845 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify
Stanley v. Georgia
394 U.S. 557 (1969) Cited 1,247 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the First and Fourteenth Amendment forbid criminalizing the private possession of obscenity
Jacobson v. United States
503 U.S. 540 (1992) Cited 524 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that predisposition must be established prior to the defendant’s first contact with a government agent
Berger v. United States
295 U.S. 78 (1935) Cited 4,154 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding there was no prejudice when four defendants were tried for a single conspiracy and two separate conspiracies were proven
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
413 U.S. 49 (1973) Cited 783 times
Holding that "the interest of the public in the quality of life and the total community environment and . . . possibly, the public safety itself" is implicated in "stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity"
Powell v. Texas
392 U.S. 514 (1968) Cited 544 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding constitutional a criminal statute against public drunkenness
Cargle v. Mullin
317 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2003) Cited 553 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding prosecutorial misconduct and deficient performance by counsel "should be included in the cumulative-error calculus if they have been individually denied for insufficient prejudice"
U.S. v. Ferguson
246 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2001) Cited 532 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that district courts "must exercise the Rule 33 authority sparingly and in the most extraordinary circumstances."
U.S. v. Autuori
212 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 527 times
Holding that a jury verdict must be upheld if a rational trier of fact "could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"
U.S. v. Sepulveda
15 F.3d 1161 (1st Cir. 1993) Cited 644 times
Holding that when cash is likely dedicated to the purchase of contraband, "a sentencing court may convert the cash into equivalent amounts of narcotics" for sentencing purposes
Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
18 U.S.C. § 1030 Cited 3,226 times 408 Legal Analyses
Holding cellular phones are protected

USA v. Valle et al

92 Cited authorities

Holding that prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify

Holding that the First and Fourteenth Amendment forbid criminalizing the private possession of obscenity

Holding that predisposition must be established prior to the defendant’s first contact with a government agent

Holding there was no prejudice when four defendants were tried for a single conspiracy and two separate conspiracies were proven

Holding that "the interest of the public in the quality of life and the total community environment and . . . possibly, the public safety itself" is implicated in "stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity"

Holding constitutional a criminal statute against public drunkenness

Holding prosecutorial misconduct and deficient performance by counsel "should be included in the cumulative-error calculus if they have been individually denied for insufficient prejudice"

Holding that district courts "must exercise the Rule 33 authority sparingly and in the most extraordinary circumstances."

Holding that a jury verdict must be upheld if a rational trier of fact "could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"

Holding that when cash is likely dedicated to the purchase of contraband, "a sentencing court may convert the cash into equivalent amounts of narcotics" for sentencing purposes

Holding cellular phones are protected