INS v. Chadha
462 U.S. 919 (1983) Cited 1,247 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that there was "adequate Art. III adverseness" because the executive branch determined that a federal statute was unconstitutional and refused to defend it but simultaneously continued to abide by it
Clinton v. City of New York
524 U.S. 417 (1998) Cited 503 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the power to enact statutes may only be exercised in accord with a single, finely wrought and exhaustively considered, procedure" outlined in Article I
Hubbard v. United States
514 U.S. 695 (1995) Cited 234 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant's criminal conviction under a particular statute must be reversed as his conduct fell outside the scope of the statute, but not finding that the underlying statute was unconstitutionally vague
United States v. Bramblett
348 U.S. 503 (1955) Cited 184 times
In Bramblett, the Court's method of analysis resulted in a decision that is at war with the text of not one, but two different Acts of Congress.
Burton v. United States
202 U.S. 344 (1906) Cited 325 times
In Burton v. United States, 202 U.S. 344, 378, a case arising in the continental United States, the Court referred to the principle established by the Trono decision without any suggestion that it was confined to cases arising in the Philippines.