470 U.S. 1 (1985) Cited 4,022 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a prosecutor's improper remarks did not rise to the level of a plainly erroneous due-process violation because they did not "undermine the fairness of the trial and contribute to a miscarriage of justice error"
430 U.S. 564 (1977) Cited 1,082 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding "appeals by the Government from . . . judgments of acquittal" entered under Rule 29 are authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3731 "unless barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution"
Holding that " defendant is guilty of aiding and abetting if he has knowingly associated himself with and participated in the criminal venture." (cleaned up)
Holding that the statute gave "fair warning" to the defendant that it applied to his conduct because "a person of ordinary intelligence" would understand that backdating a document is a falsity
476 U.S. 140 (1986) Cited 258 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trial judge's grant of a demurrer, based on insufficiency of the evidence to establish factual guilt, constituted a nonappealable acquittal under the Double Jeopardy Clause
Holding that the district court's decision "not to give such mitigating factors the weight that [the defendant] contends they deserve does not render her sentence unreasonable"
Holding that, as long as the Guidelines range is treated as advisory, a sentencing court may consider and find facts by a preponderance of the evidence, provided that those facts do not increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum
Holding that the defendant knowingly and willingly entered into the plea agreement where the Appellant waived the reading of the indictment and "testified at his allocution that he had reviewed the indictment and the plea agreement with his attorney, that his attorney had explained those documents to him, and that he understood those documents."