45 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Young

    470 U.S. 1 (1985)   Cited 4,022 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prosecutor's improper remarks did not rise to the level of a plainly erroneous due-process violation because they did not "undermine the fairness of the trial and contribute to a miscarriage of justice error"
  2. Glasser v. U.S.

    315 U.S. 60 (1942)   Cited 7,024 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a jury verdict must be sustained "if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it"
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.

    430 U.S. 564 (1977)   Cited 1,082 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding "appeals by the Government from . . . judgments of acquittal" entered under Rule 29 are authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3731 "unless barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution"
  4. U.S. v. Burgos

    94 F.3d 849 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 992 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " defendant is guilty of aiding and abetting if he has knowingly associated himself with and participated in the criminal venture." (cleaned up)
  5. U.S. v. Hunt

    526 F.3d 739 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 500 times
    Holding that the statute gave "fair warning" to the defendant that it applied to his conduct because "a person of ordinary intelligence" would understand that backdating a document is a falsity
  6. Smalis v. Pennsylvania

    476 U.S. 140 (1986)   Cited 258 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge's grant of a demurrer, based on insufficiency of the evidence to establish factual guilt, constituted a nonappealable acquittal under the Double Jeopardy Clause
  7. U.S. v. Alerre

    430 F.3d 681 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 313 times
    Affirming conviction based on testimony of a co-conspirator
  8. U.S.A. v. Lessner

    498 F.3d 185 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 226 times
    Holding that the district court's decision "not to give such mitigating factors the weight that [the defendant] contends they deserve does not render her sentence unreasonable"
  9. U.S. v. Benkahla

    530 F.3d 300 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 162 times
    Holding that, as long as the Guidelines range is treated as advisory, a sentencing court may consider and find facts by a preponderance of the evidence, provided that those facts do not increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum
  10. U.S. v. Juncal

    245 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 163 times
    Holding that the defendant knowingly and willingly entered into the plea agreement where the Appellant waived the reading of the indictment and "testified at his allocution that he had reviewed the indictment and the plea agreement with his attorney, that his attorney had explained those documents to him, and that he understood those documents."
  11. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,360 times   303 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements
  12. Section 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

    18 U.S.C. § 1512   Cited 4,374 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Defining "law enforcement officer" as "an officer or employee of the Federal Government "
  13. Section 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

    18 U.S.C. § 1519   Cited 784 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the making of a false entry in a record with the intent to influence the administration of a bankruptcy proceeding
  14. Section 1515 - Definitions for certain provisions; general provision

    18 U.S.C. § 1515   Cited 332 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining "corruptly . . . [a]s used in section 1505"