106 Cited authorities

  1. Skilling v. U.S.

    561 U.S. 358 (2010)   Cited 1,659 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Hedgpeth's harmless-error approach applies on direct appeal
  2. Hamling v. United States

    418 U.S. 87 (1974)   Cited 3,365 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statutory language in an indictment “must be accompanied with ... the facts and circumstances as will inform the accused of the specific offence” and “enable him to plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of prosecution for the same offense”
  3. United States v. Williams

    504 U.S. 36 (1992)   Cited 959 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under federal law, the government is not required to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury
  4. McNally v. United States

    483 U.S. 350 (1987)   Cited 1,102 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the mail fraud statute is "limited in scope to the protection of property rights"
  5. Muscarello v. United States

    524 U.S. 125 (1998)   Cited 690 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "us[ing] or carr[ying] a firearm" occurs when the firearm is locked in the glove compartment or trunk of a vehicle that the defendant is driving
  6. Sabri v. U.S.

    541 U.S. 600 (2004)   Cited 408 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress was authorized under the Spending Clause to enact § 666 to "protect spending objects from the menace of local administrators on the take"
  7. Costello v. United States

    350 U.S. 359 (1956)   Cited 2,003 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may not look behind the indictment to determine if the evidence upon which it was based is sufficient
  8. Carpenter v. United States

    484 U.S. 19 (1987)   Cited 625 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[t]he [Wall Street] Journal had a property right in keeping confidential and making exclusive use, prior to publication, of the schedule and contents of the ‘Heard’ column" and that "it is sufficient that the Journal has been deprived of its right to exclusive use of the information, for exclusivity is an important aspect of confidential business information and most private property for that matter "
  9. Moskal v. United States

    498 U.S. 103 (1990)   Cited 562 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule of lenity is not triggered because it is "possible to articulate" a narrower construction of a statute
  10. United States v. Harriss

    347 U.S. 612 (1954)   Cited 1,465 times
    Holding that "[t]he constitutional requirement of definiteness is violated by a criminal statute that fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute."
  11. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 23,913 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law
  12. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 12,036 times   172 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"
  13. Section 1951 - Interference with commerce by threats or violence

    18 U.S.C. § 1951   Cited 11,662 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Defining extortion in ACCA as “the obtaining of something of value from another, with his consent, induced by the wrongful use or threatened use of force against the person or property of another ”
  14. Section 1952 - Interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises

    18 U.S.C. § 1952   Cited 3,270 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Making it illegal to travel in interstate commerce to further a gambling business that is illegal under applicable state law
  15. Section 3156 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 3156   Cited 1,967 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining "judicial officer" to include a magistrate judge
  16. Section 1346 - Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud"

    18 U.S.C. § 1346   Cited 1,297 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Stating that term "scheme or artifice to defraud," as used inter alia in wire fraud statute, see id. § 1343, "includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services"
  17. Section 3372 - Prohibited acts

    16 U.S.C. § 3372   Cited 270 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Banning importation of wildlife that has been "taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any . . . foreign law"
  18. Section 200.45 - Bribe giving for public office

    N.Y. Penal Law § 200.45   Cited 7 times

    A person is guilty of bribe giving for public office when he confers, or offers or agrees to confer, any money or other property upon a public servant or a party officer upon an agreement or understanding that some person will or may be appointed to a public office or designated or nominated as a candidate for public office. Bribe giving for public office is a class D felony. N.Y. Penal Law § 200.45