52 Cited authorities

Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Tr. Funds
568 U.S. 455 (2013) Cited 1,819 times 100 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain merits questions “should not be resolved in deciding whether to certify a proposed class,” but are “properly addressed at trial or in a ruling on a summary-judgment motion”
Schmuck v. United States
489 U.S. 705 (1989) Cited 1,161 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that "routine" mailings that occurred "after the fraud [had] come to fruition" were part of the execution of the defendant's fraudulent scheme because the fraud was not a "'one-shot' operation," but an "ongoing fraudulent venture"
Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
501 U.S. 1083 (1991) Cited 609 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 14 liability may not be established on "mere disbelief or undisclosed motive without any demonstration that the proxy statement was false or misleading"
Pasquantino v. U.S.
544 U.S. 349 (2005) Cited 272 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[v]aluable entitlement" to be paid taxes is property
U.S. v. Yousef
327 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2003) Cited 821 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a U.S. nexus must be demonstrated for a federal criminal statute to apply extraterritorially, but not reaching the vessel registry issue because it was not presented
U.S. v. Autuori
212 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 527 times
Holding that a jury verdict must be upheld if a rational trier of fact "could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"
U.S. v. Whitfield
590 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2009) Cited 250 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that district court was not bound by evidentiary rulings in first trial
United States v. Kassar
660 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2011) Cited 180 times
Holding that 18 U.S.C. § 2332(b) contains "explicit provisions applying them extraterritorially"
U.S. v. Eisen
974 F.2d 246 (2d Cir. 1992) Cited 274 times
Holding that where defendant "was on notice that his requested charge was the subject of further consideration," he "could not have been substantially misled by the Court, in formulating his summation argument"
United States v. Binday
804 F.3d 558 (2d Cir. 2015) Cited 142 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that victim sustains loss from fraud if defendant intends his misrepresentation to induce victim to enter transaction without relevant facts necessary to make informed economic decision
Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television
18 U.S.C. § 1343 Cited 11,950 times 170 Legal Analyses
Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"
Section 3293 - Financial institution offenses
18 U.S.C. § 3293 Cited 136 times 7 Legal Analyses
Codifying part of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, or FIRREA

USA v. Robson et al

52 Cited authorities

Holding that certain merits questions “should not be resolved in deciding whether to certify a proposed class,” but are “properly addressed at trial or in a ruling on a summary-judgment motion”

Holding that "routine" mailings that occurred "after the fraud [had] come to fruition" were part of the execution of the defendant's fraudulent scheme because the fraud was not a "'one-shot' operation," but an "ongoing fraudulent venture"

Holding that § 14 liability may not be established on "mere disbelief or undisclosed motive without any demonstration that the proxy statement was false or misleading"

Holding that "[v]aluable entitlement" to be paid taxes is property

Holding that a U.S. nexus must be demonstrated for a federal criminal statute to apply extraterritorially, but not reaching the vessel registry issue because it was not presented

Holding that a jury verdict must be upheld if a rational trier of fact "could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"

Holding that district court was not bound by evidentiary rulings in first trial

Holding that 18 U.S.C. § 2332(b) contains "explicit provisions applying them extraterritorially"

Holding that where defendant "was on notice that his requested charge was the subject of further consideration," he "could not have been substantially misled by the Court, in formulating his summation argument"

Holding that victim sustains loss from fraud if defendant intends his misrepresentation to induce victim to enter transaction without relevant facts necessary to make informed economic decision

Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"

Codifying part of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, or FIRREA