43 Cited authorities

Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (1983) Cited 18,974 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"
Ornelas v. United States
517 U.S. 690 (1996) Cited 6,549 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that appellate courts should review reasonable suspicion and probable cause determinations de novo
Franks v. Delaware
438 U.S. 154 (1978) Cited 11,236 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the defendant is entitled, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, to his hearing" if he makes the required preliminary showing
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
412 U.S. 218 (1973) Cited 11,973 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search
Payton v. New York
445 U.S. 573 (1980) Cited 7,629 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"
Nix v. Williams
467 U.S. 431 (1984) Cited 3,126 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the benefits and costs of the exclusionary rule "are properly balanced by putting the police in the same, not a worse , position that they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred"
Texas v. Brown
460 U.S. 730 (1983) Cited 3,080 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding probable cause supported by officer's testimony, based on his participation in previous narcotics arrests, that balloons tied like the one possessed by the defendant frequently contain narcotics
United States v. Ventresca
380 U.S. 102 (1965) Cited 3,902 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that affidavits for search warrants must be interpreted in a "commonsense and realistic fashion" because they "are normally drafted by nonlawyers in the midst and haste of a criminal investigation"
United States v. Watson
423 U.S. 411 (1976) Cited 2,159 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that probable cause supports warrantless arrest of a suspect
Ewing v. City of Stockton
588 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 1,597 times
Holding that, in reviewing a challenge to a search warrant, we ask whether probable cause exists after purging false statements and correcting misleading statements

USA v. Phua et al

43 Cited authorities

Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"

Holding that appellate courts should review reasonable suspicion and probable cause determinations de novo

Holding that "the defendant is entitled, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, to his hearing" if he makes the required preliminary showing

Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search

Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that the benefits and costs of the exclusionary rule "are properly balanced by putting the police in the same, not a worse , position that they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred"

Holding probable cause supported by officer's testimony, based on his participation in previous narcotics arrests, that balloons tied like the one possessed by the defendant frequently contain narcotics

Holding that affidavits for search warrants must be interpreted in a "commonsense and realistic fashion" because they "are normally drafted by nonlawyers in the midst and haste of a criminal investigation"

Holding that probable cause supports warrantless arrest of a suspect

Holding that, in reviewing a challenge to a search warrant, we ask whether probable cause exists after purging false statements and correcting misleading statements