§Why CasetextPricing

USA v. Philip Morris USA, et al

RESPONSE to The United States' Objections to the Written Direct Examination of William E. Wecker Ph.D. and Exhibits Submitted Therewith 4955

5 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Mendoza-Paz

    286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 203 times
    Finding that the jury does not need to find that the Defendant knew the weight and type of drugs

  2. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,578 times   650 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  3. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,650 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

  4. Rule 802 - The Rule Against Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 802   Cited 3,806 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing federal statutes, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or Supreme Court rules as sources for exceptions to the rule against hearsay

  5. Rule 1006 - Summaries to Prove Content

    Fed. R. Evid. 1006   Cited 1,734 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a "summary, chart, or calculation to prove the content of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs that cannot be conveniently examined in court."