United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
566 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2009) Cited 207 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the verb "include" is non-limiting where the "most obvious way" to limit a definition would be to write it the way Congress wrote other limited definitions nearby
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
449 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006) Cited 82 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding that “[e]ach cigarette manufacturing company gains a small amount (less than 10%) of smokers through ‘switching’ or changing brands. Only about 9% of adult smokers switch among [the major tobacco manufacturer's] brands.”
U.S. v. Philip Morris U.S. Inc.
787 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2011) Cited 7 timesDenying motion for vacatur
Section 1964 - Civil remedies
18 U.S.C. § 1964 Cited 6,086 times 41 Legal AnalysesGranting civil remedies for RICO violation