47 Cited authorities

Kyles v. Whitley
514 U.S. 419 (1995) Cited 7,260 times 36 Legal Analyses
Holding the State's disclosure obligation turns on the cumulative effect of all suppressed evidence favorable to the defense
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (1963) Cited 43,391 times 133 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
564 U.S. 647 (2011) Cited 1,548 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding a certification of the blood alcohol content of a sample to be testimonial
Berger v. United States
295 U.S. 78 (1935) Cited 4,154 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding there was no prejudice when four defendants were tried for a single conspiracy and two separate conspiracies were proven
U.S. v. Howell
231 F.3d 615 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 1,294 times
Holding that evidence on a motion to suppress is needed "only when the moving papers allege facts" that "enable the trial court to conclude that contested issues of fact exist"
U.S. v. Nordby
225 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 351 times
Holding that reading the indictment as a whole, "[w]e have no doubt that [the defendant] was fully aware of the charges against him"
U.S. v. Dukagjini
326 F.3d 45 (2d Cir. 2002) Cited 302 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that introduction of recorded conversations via an expert's testimony violated the Confrontation Clause where no expertise was needed to understand the conversation
Hein v. Sullivan
601 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2010) Cited 228 times
Holding that a prosecutor's derogatory comments in closing argument regarding defendants and defense counsel were not prejudicial
U.S. v. Frederick
78 F.3d 1370 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 335 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that the stronger the prosecution's case against Defendant, the greater the cumulative error must be to warrant reversal
U.S. v. Moon
513 F.3d 527 (6th Cir. 2008) Cited 235 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that patients can qualify as victims of health-care fraud for the purposes of USSG § 8Al.l(b)
Rule 602 - Need for Personal Knowledge
Fed. R. Evid. 602 Cited 3,503 times 13 Legal Analyses
Stating that " witness may testify only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter"
Rule 105 - Limiting Evidence That Is Not Admissible Against Other Parties or for Other Purposes
Fed. R. Evid. 105 Cited 621 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing district court's power to admit evidence for a limited purpose

USA v. Noriega et al

47 Cited authorities

Holding the State's disclosure obligation turns on the cumulative effect of all suppressed evidence favorable to the defense

Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence

Holding a certification of the blood alcohol content of a sample to be testimonial

Holding there was no prejudice when four defendants were tried for a single conspiracy and two separate conspiracies were proven

Holding that evidence on a motion to suppress is needed "only when the moving papers allege facts" that "enable the trial court to conclude that contested issues of fact exist"

Holding that reading the indictment as a whole, "[w]e have no doubt that [the defendant] was fully aware of the charges against him"

Holding that introduction of recorded conversations via an expert's testimony violated the Confrontation Clause where no expertise was needed to understand the conversation

Holding that a prosecutor's derogatory comments in closing argument regarding defendants and defense counsel were not prejudicial

Holding that the stronger the prosecution's case against Defendant, the greater the cumulative error must be to warrant reversal

Finding that patients can qualify as victims of health-care fraud for the purposes of USSG § 8Al.l(b)

Stating that " witness may testify only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter"

Recognizing district court's power to admit evidence for a limited purpose