107 Cited authorities

Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA
568 U.S. 398 (2013) Cited 3,108 times 169 Legal Analyses
Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"
Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (1968) Cited 38,294 times 73 Legal Analyses
Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (1963) Cited 43,778 times 133 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence
Franks v. Delaware
438 U.S. 154 (1978) Cited 11,290 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the defendant is entitled, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, to his hearing" if he makes the required preliminary showing
Brigham City v. Stuart
547 U.S. 398 (2006) Cited 2,592 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that "law enforcement officers may enter a home without a warrant . . . to protect an occupant from imminent injury"
Payton v. New York
445 U.S. 573 (1980) Cited 7,650 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"
Katz v. United States
389 U.S. 347 (1967) Cited 12,514 times 74 Legal Analyses
Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"
Evitts v. Lucey
469 U.S. 387 (1985) Cited 4,512 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the right to effective assistance of counsel includes the right to effective assistance of appellate counsel
Wong Sun v. United States
371 U.S. 471 (1963) Cited 12,269 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding evidence stemming from Fourth Amendment violations must be excluded from trial as fruit of the poisonous tree
Samson v. California
547 U.S. 843 (2006) Cited 1,354 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction
Section 2518 - Procedure for interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications
18 U.S.C. § 2518 Cited 2,900 times 13 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that some investigative techniques may be “too dangerous”
Section 2517 - Authorization for disclosure and use of intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications
18 U.S.C. § 2517 Cited 401 times
Restricting disclosure of the contents of wiretap communications to the enumerated provisions
Section 1801 - Definitions
50 U.S.C. § 1801 Cited 280 times 10 Legal Analyses
Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States
Section 1806 - Use of information
50 U.S.C. § 1806 Cited 169 times 4 Legal Analyses
Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"
Section 1804 - Applications for court orders
50 U.S.C. § 1804 Cited 109 times 1 Legal Analyses
Authorizing electronic surveillance under FISA
Section 1805 - Issuance of order
50 U.S.C. § 1805 Cited 100 times
Requiring "probable cause to believe . . . the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power"
Section 1881a - Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons
50 U.S.C. § 1881a Cited 75 times 11 Legal Analyses
Permitting review of FISA orders by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Section 1803 - Designation of judges
50 U.S.C. § 1803 Cited 68 times 1 Legal Analyses
(a) Court to hear applications and grant orders; record of denial; transmittal to court of review (1) The Chief Justice of the United States shall publicly designate 11 district court judges from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits of whom no fewer than 3 shall reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia who shall constitute a court which shall have jurisdiction to hear applications for and grant orders approving electronic surveillance anywhere within the United States under
Section 2709 - Counterintelligence access to telephone toll and transactional records
18 U.S.C. § 2709 Cited 45 times 8 Legal Analyses
Containing the NSL non-disclosure requirement mandating that "no [ECSP] . . . shall disclose to any person that the [FBI] has sought or obtained access to information or records under this section"
Section 1861 - Definitions
50 U.S.C. § 1861 Cited 33 times 6 Legal Analyses
Providing that "[n]o person shall disclose to any other person that the [FBI] has sought or obtained tangible things pursuant to an order under" Title V of FISA

USA v. Muhtorov et al

107 Cited authorities

Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence

Holding that "the defendant is entitled, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, to his hearing" if he makes the required preliminary showing

Holding that "law enforcement officers may enter a home without a warrant . . . to protect an occupant from imminent injury"

Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"

Holding that the right to effective assistance of counsel includes the right to effective assistance of appellate counsel

Holding evidence stemming from Fourth Amendment violations must be excluded from trial as fruit of the poisonous tree

Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction

Recognizing that some investigative techniques may be “too dangerous”

Restricting disclosure of the contents of wiretap communications to the enumerated provisions

Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States

Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"

Authorizing electronic surveillance under FISA

Requiring "probable cause to believe . . . the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power"

Permitting review of FISA orders by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Containing the NSL non-disclosure requirement mandating that "no [ECSP] . . . shall disclose to any person that the [FBI] has sought or obtained access to information or records under this section"

Providing that "[n]o person shall disclose to any other person that the [FBI] has sought or obtained tangible things pursuant to an order under" Title V of FISA