10 Cited authorities

United States v. Kenny
645 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 254 times
Holding there was no ethical violation where a codefendant “agreed to cooperate with the Government” and “recorded a telephone conversation with [the represented defendant]”
United States v. Kopituk
690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir. 1982) Cited 239 times
Holding that joinder of tax offenses was proper where the tax offenses concealed illegal payoffs
United States v. Lewis
787 F.2d 1318 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 205 times
Concluding that severance was required where evidence of prior crimes was admissible for some but not all charges and the evidence of one joined charge was "sparse"
U.S. v. Whitworth
856 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 142 times
Holding that "the introduction of inadmissible evidence by one party allows an opponent, in the court's discretion, to introduce evidence on the same issue to rebut any false impression that might have resulted from the earlier admission"
U.S. v. Patterson
819 F.2d 1495 (9th Cir. 1987) Cited 116 times
Finding that under Rule 703 facts or data relied upon for expert testimony are admissible when they help the jury understand complex subject matter
United States v. Halper
590 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1978) Cited 124 times
Holding that Rule 8 does not permit the joinder of tax fraud charges and unrelated fraud charges where the government does not allege a clear connection between the misreported income and the proceeds of the unrelated fraud
U.S. v. Matus-Leva
311 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 16 times
Holding that the district court properly denied a motion to suppress because the pre-arraignment delay was reasonable under the circumstances, which included providing the defendant with medical treatment
United States v. Recker
No. 12-CR-2027-LRR (N.D. Iowa Mar. 1, 2013) Cited 4 times
No. 12-CR-2027-LRR 03-01-2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL RECKER, Defendant. LINDA R. READE ORDER TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................ 2 II. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ......... 2 A. Indictment ........................................ 2 1. Grain elevator fraud ............................. 2 2. Bankruptcy fraud ............................... 3 B. Motions .......................................... 4 III. MOTION TO SEVER COUNTS
United States v. Davis
663 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 33 times
Nos. 80-1094, 80-1100 and 80-1101. Argued and Submitted February 6, 1981. Decided August 10, 1981. Rehearings in No. 80-1094 Denied September 14 and November 6, 1981. Lodged with Clerk July 23, 1981. Philip A. DeMassa, San Diego, Cal., for Davis. Donald B. Marks, Marks Brooklier, Beverly Hills, Cal., for Snyder. Arthur Mabry, Los Angeles, Cal., for Montgomery. Eric L. Dobberteen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., argued for the United States; Andrea Sheridan Ordin, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal
Section 7206 - Fraud and false statements
26 U.S.C. § 7206 Cited 3,820 times 22 Legal Analyses
Setting three years as maximum term of imprisonment for false tax return

USA v. Liew et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding there was no ethical violation where a codefendant “agreed to cooperate with the Government” and “recorded a telephone conversation with [the represented defendant]”

Holding that joinder of tax offenses was proper where the tax offenses concealed illegal payoffs

Concluding that severance was required where evidence of prior crimes was admissible for some but not all charges and the evidence of one joined charge was "sparse"

Holding that "the introduction of inadmissible evidence by one party allows an opponent, in the court's discretion, to introduce evidence on the same issue to rebut any false impression that might have resulted from the earlier admission"

Finding that under Rule 703 facts or data relied upon for expert testimony are admissible when they help the jury understand complex subject matter

Holding that Rule 8 does not permit the joinder of tax fraud charges and unrelated fraud charges where the government does not allege a clear connection between the misreported income and the proceeds of the unrelated fraud

Holding that the district court properly denied a motion to suppress because the pre-arraignment delay was reasonable under the circumstances, which included providing the defendant with medical treatment

Setting three years as maximum term of imprisonment for false tax return