35 Cited authorities

Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (1983) Cited 18,966 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"
Payton v. New York
445 U.S. 573 (1980) Cited 7,629 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"
Chimel v. California
395 U.S. 752 (1969) Cited 5,663 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that, absent a search warrant, there is "no . . . justification" for searching an area not within a suspect's immediate control during an arrest
United States v. United States District Court
407 U.S. 297 (1972) Cited 1,387 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that no warrant exception existed for "domestic security" surveillance but explicitly stating that the Court had "not addressed, and express[ed] no opinion as to, the issues which may be involved with respect to activities of foreign powers or their agents"
Henry v. United States
361 U.S. 98 (1959) Cited 1,703 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that evidence discovered during a search incident to an unlawful arrest is inadmissible
Marron v. United States
275 U.S. 192 (1927) Cited 1,193 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 (1927), also cited by the majority, the Court upheld the seizure of business records as being incident to a valid arrest for operating an illegal retail whiskey enterprise.
Sgro v. United States
287 U.S. 206 (1932) Cited 640 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a twenty-one-day delay that elapsed between an officer’s application for a search warrant and the officer’s execution of the search warrant nullified probable cause
U.S. v. Zimmerman
277 F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2002) Cited 245 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding good faith exception did not apply because single video clip of pornography was traced to suspect's home six months prior to warrant's execution and circumstances did not involve hurried judgment
U.S. v. Hill
459 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 196 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the government's proposal to permit on-site inspection and analysis of child pornography was inadequate because of the time necessary to conduct the analysis
U.S. v. Wagner
989 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1993) Cited 266 times
Holding that "[c]orroboration of information the [confidential informant] gave the officers was amply provided by the fact that the [confidential informant] made six supervised purchases of marijuana and cocaine from members of the alleged conspiracy, and two drug purchases from another suspect"
Section 1832 - Theft of trade secrets
18 U.S.C. § 1832 Cited 404 times 93 Legal Analyses
Requiring that trade secret “relate to” or be “included in” product
Section 1831 - Economic espionage
18 U.S.C. § 1831 Cited 320 times 85 Legal Analyses
Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets

USA v. Liew et al

35 Cited authorities

Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"

Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that, absent a search warrant, there is "no . . . justification" for searching an area not within a suspect's immediate control during an arrest

Holding that no warrant exception existed for "domestic security" surveillance but explicitly stating that the Court had "not addressed, and express[ed] no opinion as to, the issues which may be involved with respect to activities of foreign powers or their agents"

Holding that evidence discovered during a search incident to an unlawful arrest is inadmissible

In Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 (1927), also cited by the majority, the Court upheld the seizure of business records as being incident to a valid arrest for operating an illegal retail whiskey enterprise.

Holding that a twenty-one-day delay that elapsed between an officer’s application for a search warrant and the officer’s execution of the search warrant nullified probable cause

Holding good faith exception did not apply because single video clip of pornography was traced to suspect's home six months prior to warrant's execution and circumstances did not involve hurried judgment

Holding that the government's proposal to permit on-site inspection and analysis of child pornography was inadequate because of the time necessary to conduct the analysis

Holding that "[c]orroboration of information the [confidential informant] gave the officers was amply provided by the fact that the [confidential informant] made six supervised purchases of marijuana and cocaine from members of the alleged conspiracy, and two drug purchases from another suspect"

Requiring that trade secret “relate to” or be “included in” product

Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets