§Why CasetextPricing

USA v. Johnston

RESPONSE

9 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Norman

    776 F.3d 67 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that the district court did not commit clear error by relying on the defendant's representation of loss where there was nothing in the record to support a finding that the loss was in fact less than that amount

  2. People v. Piznarski

    113 A.D.3d 166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2013-12-5 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael J. PIZNARSKI, Appellant. J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for appellant. William G. Gabor, District Attorney, Wampsville (Robert A. Mascari of counsel), for respondent. STEIN J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for appellant. William G. Gabor, District Attorney, Wampsville (Robert A. Mascari of counsel), for respondent. Before: ROSE, J.P., LAHTINEN, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ. STEIN, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison

  3. People v. Church

    31 A.D.3d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 21 times   1 Legal Analyses

    16262. July 13, 2006. Cardona, PJ. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Sherman, J.), rendered May 31, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of 10 counts of the crime of unlawful surveillance in the second degree. Before: Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ. During the late summer of 2003 through the summer of 2004, defendant owned or maintained three apartment buildings in the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County. In August 2004, one of defendant's female

  4. People v. Evans

    27 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 18 times

    16134. March 16, 2006. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered December 2, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of unlawful surveillance in the second degree. Peter Henner, Clarksville, for appellant. Stephen F. Lungen, District Attorney, Monticello (Bonnie M. Mitzner of counsel), for respondent. Before: Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Spain, J. In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant

  5. U.S. v. Hugh

    533 F.3d 910 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that § 2511 requires "only" proof of intent and not of willfulness

  6. State v. Stearns

    39 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 3 times

    No. 16645. April 12, 2007. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Fulton County (Giardino, J.), rendered August 11, 2005, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of unlawful surveillance in the second degree and endangering the welfare of an incompetent or physically disabled person. Catherine A. Barber, Schenectady, for appellant. Louise K. Sira, District Attorney, Johnstown (Chad W. Brown of counsel), for respondent. Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters and Carpinello, JJ. Crew

  7. U.S. v. Reithemeyer

    426 F. Supp. 2d 893 (E.D. Ark. 2006)

    No. 4:05CR00194 JLH. April 11, 2006. Randel K. Miller, Miller Law Firm, Jonesboro, AR, Leslie Borgognoni, Attorney At Law, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant. OPINION HOLMES, District Judge. On April 11, 2006, the Court sentenced the defendant Stuart Wayne Reithemeyer to 36 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $1,000.00. The term of imprisonment was 24 months more than the high end of the guidelines range. The Court writes this separate opinion to explain the decision

  8. Section 3553 - Imposition of a sentence

    18 U.S.C. § 3553   Cited 76,838 times   111 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court must consider whether its decision will "protect the public from further crimes of the defendant"

  9. Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

    18 U.S.C. § 1030   Cited 3,250 times   408 Legal Analyses
    Holding cellular phones are protected