59 Cited authorities

  1. County of Sacramento v. Lewis

    523 U.S. 833 (1998)   Cited 9,017 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "only a purpose to cause harm unrelated to the legitimate object of arrest will satisfy the element of arbitrary conduct shocking to the conscience, necessary for a due process violation"
  2. Riley v. California

    573 U.S. 373 (2014)   Cited 2,800 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the call records and text messages contained on a cell phone owned by his employer because he "had a right to exclude others from using the phone" and explaining that "a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in the analysis, and lack thereof is not dispositive"
  3. McCleskey v. Zant

    499 U.S. 467 (1991)   Cited 5,408 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "colorable showing of factual innocence" satisfies the "ends of justice" requirement
  4. Washington v. Glucksberg

    521 U.S. 702 (1997)   Cited 2,737 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no fundamental right to physician-assisted suicide
  5. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for D.C

    542 U.S. 367 (2004)   Cited 1,394 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the writ is appropriate only when the petitioner has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" (quoting Kerr , 426 U.S. at 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119 )
  6. Simmons v. United States

    390 U.S. 377 (1968)   Cited 6,511 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's testimony to establish standing for purposes of claiming a Fourth Amendment violation "should not be admissible against him at trial on the question of guilt or innocence"
  7. United States v. Nixon

    418 U.S. 683 (1974)   Cited 4,165 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254
  8. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic

    547 U.S. 47 (2006)   Cited 883 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing about having military recruiters on campus "suggests that law schools agree with any speech by recruiters"
  9. Baker v. Carr

    369 U.S. 186 (1962)   Cited 5,301 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge Tennessee's apportionment of state representatives when that apportionment "effect[ed] a gross disproportion of representation to voting population"
  10. Branzburg v. Hayes

    408 U.S. 665 (1972)   Cited 1,830 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 100,403 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Section 1291 - Final decisions of district courts

    28 U.S.C. § 1291   Cited 90,927 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Granting jurisdiction to the courts of appeals from final decisions of federal district courts "except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court"
  13. Section 2241 - Power to grant writ

    28 U.S.C. § 2241   Cited 83,614 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to determine whether detention is "in violation of the . . . laws . . . of the United States"
  14. Section 1651 - Writs

    28 U.S.C. § 1651   Cited 11,436 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Granting us the power to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of [our] . . . jurisdiction[] and agreeable to the usages and principles of law"
  15. Section 3141 - Release and detention authority generally

    18 U.S.C. § 3141   Cited 1,632 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining availability of bail pending trial, sentencing, and appeal but not discussing bail as alternative to prison
  16. Section 1613a - Appellate jurisdiction of District Court; procedure; review by United States Court of Appeals for Third Circuit; rules; appeals to appellate court

    48 U.S.C. § 1613a   Cited 271 times
    Granting authority for United States district court to sit in appellate capacity over Territorial Courts of the Virgin Islands
  17. Section 1002 - Assistance capability requirements

    47 U.S.C. § 1002   Cited 48 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Excluding "information services"
  18. Section 1005 - Cooperation of equipment manufacturers and providers of telecommunications support services

    47 U.S.C. § 1005

    (a) Consultation A telecommunications carrier shall consult, as necessary, in a timely fashion with manufacturers of its telecommunications transmission and switching equipment and its providers of telecommunications support services for the purpose of ensuring that current and planned equipment, facilities, and services comply with the capability requirements of section 1002 of this title and the capacity requirements identified by the Attorney General under section 1003 of this title. (b) Cooperation