19 Cited authorities

Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,806 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (1998) Cited 5,587 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an issue is moot when "there is nothing for us to remedy"
Allen v. Wright
468 U.S. 737 (1984) Cited 4,753 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"
Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona
520 U.S. 43 (1997) Cited 2,516 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the plaintiff's challenge to a state law affecting the performance of her job duties was mooted when she left state employment
Honig v. Doe
484 U.S. 305 (1988) Cited 2,074 times
Holding that respondent's case in the IDEA context was not moot because he still resided in the state of California, which insisted that all local school districts retain residual authority to exclude disabled children for dangerous conduct
Church of Scientology of California v. United States
506 U.S. 9 (1992) Cited 1,590 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an appeal concerning produced tape recordings was not moot because a court could "effectuate a partial remedy by ordering the [receiving party] to destroy" copies of the recordings
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California
464 U.S. 501 (1984) Cited 1,763 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that media have a right of access to voir dire
United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty
445 U.S. 388 (1980) Cited 2,012 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding even a named plaintiff whose individual claims are moot retains a "personal stake" in representing the class jurisdictionally sufficient to appeal the denial of class certification
Napue v. Illinois
360 U.S. 264 (1959) Cited 4,810 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it knowingly offers or fails to correct false or misleading testimony
Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (1936) Cited 8,260 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"
Section 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments
18 U.S.C. § 1956 Cited 9,281 times 141 Legal Analyses
Defining “specified unlawful activity” to include, inter alia, controlled substance violations, murder, bribery, smuggling, various forms of fraud, concealment of assets, various environmental offenses, and health care offenses
Section 2339B - Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations
18 U.S.C. § 2339B Cited 569 times 15 Legal Analyses
Clarifying the scope of “personnel”
Section 1701 - Unusual and extraordinary threat; declaration of national emergency; exercise of Presidential authorities
50 U.S.C. § 1701 Cited 422 times 63 Legal Analyses
Granting Presidential emergency power "to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States"

USA v. Holy Land Foundation For Relief and Development et al

19 Cited authorities

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that an issue is moot when "there is nothing for us to remedy"

Holding that the plaintiff's challenge to a state law affecting the performance of her job duties was mooted when she left state employment

Holding that respondent's case in the IDEA context was not moot because he still resided in the state of California, which insisted that all local school districts retain residual authority to exclude disabled children for dangerous conduct

Holding that an appeal concerning produced tape recordings was not moot because a court could "effectuate a partial remedy by ordering the [receiving party] to destroy" copies of the recordings

Holding that media have a right of access to voir dire

Holding even a named plaintiff whose individual claims are moot retains a "personal stake" in representing the class jurisdictionally sufficient to appeal the denial of class certification

Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it knowingly offers or fails to correct false or misleading testimony

Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"

Defining “specified unlawful activity” to include, inter alia, controlled substance violations, murder, bribery, smuggling, various forms of fraud, concealment of assets, various environmental offenses, and health care offenses

Clarifying the scope of “personnel”

Granting Presidential emergency power "to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States"