Holding that a defendant's conviction of a lesser included offense prohibits prosecution on a greater offense, and vice-versa, because the greater and lesser offenses are the "same offense" for double jeopardy purposes
526 U.S. 275 (1999) Cited 358 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that kidnaping is a continuing offense because the "conduct constituting the offense" continues throughout the journey and "does not end until the victim is free"
524 U.S. 1 (1998) Cited 288 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that for the offense of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(B) and 1957, the existence of criminally generated proceeds was a circumstance element of the offense and, therefore, that where the laundered funds were unlawfully generated was irrelevant for venue purposes
336 U.S. 613 (1949) Cited 769 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding "[i]t is clear that failure to prove a conspiracy among A, B and C does not preclude a conviction on a count that A aided Y in committing a substantive offense."
Rejecting duplicity argument, holding it was "permissible under section 7201 to charge tax evasion covering several years in a single count as a 'course of conduct' in circumstances where the underlying basis of the indictment is an allegedly consistent, long-term pattern of conduct directed at the evasion of taxes for these years"
Explaining that the venue protections "ensure that a criminal defendant cannot be tried in a distant, remote, or unfriendly forum solely at the prosecutor's whim"