17 Cited authorities

United States v. Bass
404 U.S. 336 (1971) Cited 1,284 times
Holding § 922(g)'s predecessor constitutional in light of the jurisdictional element
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.
499 U.S. 244 (1991) Cited 629 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the presumption against extraterritorial application of federal statutes prevented an employee fired from work being done in Saudi Arabia from sustaining an anti-discrimination action brought under Title VII
Arthur Andersen v. U. S
544 U.S. 696 (2005) Cited 316 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that knowingly corruptly persuading another to destroy records to interfere with an official proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) requires proof that the proceeding was, if not "pending or about to be instituted," at least foreseen when the defendant acted
Crandon v. United States
494 U.S. 152 (1990) Cited 496 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that meaning of statute is to be determined from design of statute as whole and its object and policy, in addition to its language
United States v. Aguilar
515 U.S. 593 (1995) Cited 387 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "if the defendant lacks knowledge that his actions are likely to affect the judicial proceeding, he lacks the requisite intent to obstruct"
United States v. Granderson
511 U.S. 39 (1994) Cited 261 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that discrete, differently worded probation and supervised release provisions should not be interpreted in pari materia
Gerling Global Reinsurance v. Gallagher
267 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2001) Cited 79 times
Applying a personal-jurisdiction-like test to determine whether Florida could regulate a German company's conduct consistent with due process
U.S. v. Barnes
295 F.3d 1354 (D.C. Cir. 2002) Cited 76 times
Rejecting the view that “Congress remedied one disparity—between felony and misdemeanor domestic violence convictions—while at the same time creating a new disparity among (and sometimes, within) states”
United States v. Bowman
260 U.S. 94 (1922) Cited 218 times 1 Legal Analyses
Approving prosecution for overseas criminal conduct under “such laws as [the United States] might pass to protect itself and its property”
Valdes v. U.S.
475 F.3d 1319 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 37 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding "official acts" encompass "inappropriate influence on decisions that the government actually makes"
Section 12 - Pleadings and Pretrial Motions
Fed. R. Crim. P. 12 Cited 4,536 times
Recognizing that "the term waiver in the context of a criminal case ordinarily refers to the intentional relinquishment of a known right" and that the Advisory Committee therefore "decided not to employ the term ‘waiver’ " in the revised rule
Section 641 - License
N.Y. Banking Law § 641 Cited 15 times 1 Legal Analyses
Prescribing an "investigation fee" for any application for a money transmitting license
Section 26-1002 - License required
D.C. Code § 26-1002 Cited 7 times
(a) After the effective date of this chapter [July 18, 2000], no person shall engage in the business of money transmission without obtaining a license issued by the Superintendent [Commissioner] under § 26-1009, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section and in § 26-1003. (b) A licensee may conduct its business in the District of Columbia at one or more locations, directly or indirectly owned by the licensee, or through one or more authorized delegates, or both, pursuant to the single license
Section 40-22-103 - License required
Wyo. Stat. § 40-22-103 1 Legal Analyses
(a) With the exception of those persons exempt pursuant to W.S. 40-22-104, on and after October 1, 2003, no person shall engage in the business of money transmission without a license. The division shall regulate money transmitters and carry out the provisions of this act. (b) A person is engaged in the business of money transmission if the person advertises, offers or provides services to Wyoming residents, for personal, family or household use, through any medium including, but not limited to,

USA v. E-GOLD, LTD. et al

17 Cited authorities

Holding § 922(g)'s predecessor constitutional in light of the jurisdictional element

Holding that the presumption against extraterritorial application of federal statutes prevented an employee fired from work being done in Saudi Arabia from sustaining an anti-discrimination action brought under Title VII

Holding that knowingly corruptly persuading another to destroy records to interfere with an official proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) requires proof that the proceeding was, if not "pending or about to be instituted," at least foreseen when the defendant acted

Holding that meaning of statute is to be determined from design of statute as whole and its object and policy, in addition to its language

Holding that "if the defendant lacks knowledge that his actions are likely to affect the judicial proceeding, he lacks the requisite intent to obstruct"

Holding that discrete, differently worded probation and supervised release provisions should not be interpreted in pari materia

Applying a personal-jurisdiction-like test to determine whether Florida could regulate a German company's conduct consistent with due process

Rejecting the view that “Congress remedied one disparity—between felony and misdemeanor domestic violence convictions—while at the same time creating a new disparity among (and sometimes, within) states”

Approving prosecution for overseas criminal conduct under “such laws as [the United States] might pass to protect itself and its property”

Holding "official acts" encompass "inappropriate influence on decisions that the government actually makes"

Recognizing that "the term waiver in the context of a criminal case ordinarily refers to the intentional relinquishment of a known right" and that the Advisory Committee therefore "decided not to employ the term ‘waiver’ " in the revised rule

Prescribing an "investigation fee" for any application for a money transmitting license