U.S. Equal Emp't Opp. Com. v. W O
213 F.3d 600 (11th Cir. 2000) Cited 940 timesHolding that "private process server fees may be taxed pursuant to §§ 1920 and 1921"
Cefalu v. Village of Elk Grove
211 F.3d 416 (7th Cir. 2000) Cited 449 timesHolding that any trial exhibit "is potentially compensable as exemplification" as long as "the means of presentation furthers [its] illustrative purpose"
Manildra Milling Corp. v. Ogilvie Mills, Inc.
76 F.3d 1178 (Fed. Cir. 1996) Cited 174 timesHolding "as a matter of law, a party who has a competitor's patent declared invalid meets the definition of 'prevailing party'" in the "context of patent litigation"
Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc.
198 F.R.D. 422 (D. Del. 2001) Cited 17 timesHolding that, in considering whether a video exhibit is taxable under section 1920, "[t]he standard the court will apply to direct its discretion is whether the video materially aided [the judge's] understanding of the technological issues in the case"
Section 1920 - Taxation of costs
28 U.S.C. § 1920 Cited 12,492 times 91 Legal AnalysesReferring only once to "expenses," and doing so solely to refer to special interpretation services provided in actions initiated by the United States