25 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,561 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute
  2. Blum v. Stenson

    465 U.S. 886 (1984)   Cited 8,811 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting is “to be calculated according to the prevailing market rates in the relevant community, regardless of whether plaintiff is represented by private or nonprofit counsel”
  3. Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products

    515 F.3d 531 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 897 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding fee award was not an abuse of discretion because "[u]nlike the plaintiff in Farrar, Imwalle was able to prove an 'actual, compensable injury'"
  4. Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury

    227 F.3d 343 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 561 times
    Holding that reasonable hourly rates should be set by reference to rates in the court's vicinage rather than in the lawyer's region of origin
  5. Geier v. Sundquist

    372 F.3d 784 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 348 times
    Holding that an award of attorney's fees is not intended to serve as a windfall
  6. Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.

    90 F.3d 1160 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 387 times
    Holding that district court does not have discretion to set off collateral source income
  7. Coulter v. Tennessee

    805 F.2d 146 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 482 times
    Holding that a district court may apply an across-the-board reduction based on "excessive or duplicative hours" and approving a 50% across-the-board reduction where "duplication of effort is a serious problem"
  8. Walburn v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    431 F.3d 966 (6th Cir. 2005)   Cited 228 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding earlier complaint could not preempt a later-filed action under the first-to-file bar where it failed to comply with Rule 9(b)
  9. U. Slate, Tile Composition v. G M Roofing

    732 F.2d 495 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 369 times
    Holding that “the determination of a reasonable fee is to be conducted by the district court regardless of any contract between plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel”
  10. Isabel v. City of Memphis

    404 F.3d 404 (6th Cir. 2005)   Cited 190 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff's success on one of four claims did not justify reducing attorney's fees
  11. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,171 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
  12. Section 1920 - Taxation of costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1920   Cited 12,475 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Referring only once to "expenses," and doing so solely to refer to special interpretation services provided in actions initiated by the United States
  13. Section 3729 - False claims

    31 U.S.C. § 3729   Cited 6,731 times   626 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "any person" who knowingly causes false claims to be presented
  14. Section 3730 - Civil actions for false claims

    31 U.S.C. § 3730   Cited 5,359 times   430 Legal Analyses
    Granting the government primary responsibility for conducting suit