41 Cited authorities

  1. Neder v. United States

    527 U.S. 1 (1999)   Cited 4,956 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the failure to submit an uncontested element of an offense to a jury may be harmless
  2. Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co.

    553 U.S. 639 (2008)   Cited 1,107 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that bidders at a county tax-lien auction plausibly alleged RICO proximate causation when they lost to a competing bidder who lied to the county about complying with the auction's rules
  3. Ashe v. Swenson

    397 U.S. 436 (1970)   Cited 3,524 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause prevents a defendant acquitted of robbing one participant at a poker game from being prosecuted for robbing any of the other participants at the same game
  4. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.

    430 U.S. 564 (1977)   Cited 1,081 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding "appeals by the Government from . . . judgments of acquittal" entered under Rule 29 are authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3731 "unless barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution"
  5. Stirone v. United States

    361 U.S. 212 (1960)   Cited 1,792 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding courts must assume "that under an indictment drawn in general terms a conviction might rest upon a showing" under those general terms
  6. Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. of Peoria

    388 F.3d 990 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 243 times
    Holding that where the defendant discontinued a promised program ninth months after the plaintiff contracted, the discontinuation alone provided "literally no evidence of fraudulent intent" because the defendant "did in fact operate the ... program for a substantial period of time before terminating it"
  7. U.S. v. Benkahla

    530 F.3d 300 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 162 times
    Holding that, as long as the Guidelines range is treated as advisory, a sentencing court may consider and find facts by a preponderance of the evidence, provided that those facts do not increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum
  8. United States v. Keplinger

    776 F.2d 678 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 201 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that various inaccuracies in a document did not render the evidence unreliable, given other evidence of accurate recordkeeping practices
  9. U.S. v. Yearwood

    518 F.3d 220 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 102 times
    Finding probative value of prior drug convictions not outweighed by potential for prejudice as government responsible for proving knowledge and intent as part of the conspiracy charge
  10. Perlman v. Zell

    185 F.3d 850 (7th Cir. 1999)   Cited 123 times
    Holding that plaintiff's recovery of only 7% of his initial demand in contract, fraud, and RICO suit undermined his claim to full attorney's fees
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,974 times   317 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
  12. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 28,349 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."
  13. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 23,811 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law
  14. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,129 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party
  15. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,341 times   302 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements
  16. Section 1346 - Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud"

    18 U.S.C. § 1346   Cited 1,290 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Stating that term "scheme or artifice to defraud," as used inter alia in wire fraud statute, see id. § 1343, "includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services"
  17. Section 1031 - Exchange of real property held for productive use or investment

    26 U.S.C. § 1031   Cited 729 times   76 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the nonrecognition of gain from exchanges of investment property for other investment property of like kind
  18. Section 203C:3 - Investment and management decisions

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 203C § 3   Cited 3 times

    (a) A trustee shall invest and manage trust assets as a prudent investor would, considering the purpose, terms, and other circumstances of the trust, including those set forth in subsection (c). In satisfying this standard, the trustee shall exercise reasonable care, skill, and caution. (b) A trustee's investment and management decisions respecting individual assets shall be considered in the context of the trust portfolio as a part of an overall investment strategy reasonably suited to the trust

  19. Section 203C:2 - Trustees managing trust assets; duty to comply with prudent investor rule

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 203C § 2   Cited 3 times

    (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a trustee who invests and manages trust assets shall owe a duty to the beneficiaries of a trust to comply with the prudent investor rule set forth in this chapter. (b) The prudent investor rule may be expanded, restricted, eliminated or otherwise altered by the provisions of a trust. A trustee shall not be liable to a beneficiary to the extent that the trustee acted in resonable reliance on the provisions of the trust. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 203C, § 2

  20. Section 1.1031(k)-1 - Treatment of deferred exchanges

    26 C.F.R. § 1.1031(k)-1   Cited 38 times
    Providing that “ qualified intermediary is a person who—... (B) Enters into a written agreement with the taxpayer (the ‘exchange agreement’) and, as required by the exchange agreement, acquires the relinquished property from the taxpayer, transfers the relinquished property, acquires the replacement property, and transfers the replacement property to the taxpayer.”