§Why CasetextPricing

USA v. CAO et al

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION

11 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,397 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"

  2. United States v. Dominguez

    783 F.2d 702 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 343 times
    Holding that the government was not required to move for detention in the district where the defendants were arrested before they were transferred to the charging district

  3. United States v. Portes

    786 F.2d 758 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 266 times
    Holding that determining whether a defendant "pose a danger to the community . . . is a judgmental function [as to which] we . . . must engage in an 'independent review' of the case."

  4. United States v. Hanjuan Jin

    733 F.3d 718 (7th Cir. 2013)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the “government does not have to prove that the owner of the trade secret actually lost money” because of the theft and noting that although the stolen trade secrets may have economic value, it may be impossible to monetize the value, or the injury may be the uncovering of the fact that a company cannot protect its trade secrets

  5. United States v. Parahams

    CAUSE NO. 3:13-CR-005 JD (N.D. Ind. Feb. 25, 2013)   Cited 2 times

    CAUSE NO. 3:13-CR-005 JD 02-25-2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JONATHAN PARAHAMS, JR. (01) JON E. DEGUILIO OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the court on defendant Jonathan Parahams's motion for judicial review of the detention order handed down by Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein on January 24, 2013, and as amended on January 25, 2013. [DE 31; DE 36]. The indictment [DE 1] charges Parahams and certain others with a conspiracy to defraud the United States by obtaining or aiding to obtain the

  6. Section 3142 - Release or detention of a defendant pending trial

    18 U.S.C. § 3142   Cited 30,546 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is at least one offense where a period of incarceration of at least ten years creates a rebuttable presumption that "no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community . . . ."

  7. Section 801 - Congressional findings and declarations: controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 801   Cited 7,268 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Finding that to effectively control interstate traffic in illegal drugs it is necessary to control intrastate possession of and traffic in those substances

  8. Section 3145 - Review and appeal of a release or detention order

    18 U.S.C. § 3145   Cited 4,410 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting independent avenue of appeal for custody orders

  9. Section 1201 - Kidnapping

    18 U.S.C. § 1201   Cited 3,383 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Providing for "imprisonment for any term of years or for life"

  10. Section 951 - Definitions

    21 U.S.C. § 951   Cited 2,744 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (a) For purposes of this subchapter- (1) The term "import" means, with respect to any article, any bringing in or introduction of such article into any area (whether or not such bringing in or introduction constitutes an importation within the meaning of the tariff laws of the United States). (2) The term "customs territory of the United States" has the meaning assigned to such term by general note 2 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. (b) Each term defined in section 802 of this

  11. Section 1831 - Economic espionage

    18 U.S.C. § 1831   Cited 320 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets