24 Cited authorities

Bronston v. United States
409 U.S. 352 (1973) Cited 408 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the perjury statute does not apply to literally true but unresponsive answers
U.S. v. McKenna
327 F.3d 830 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 227 times
Holding that dispute over trial tactics "is not a sufficient conflict to warrant substitution of counsel"
U.S. v. Yarbrough
852 F.2d 1522 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 229 times
Holding that the government may prove knowledge of the warrant by inference
U.S. v. Gordon
844 F.2d 1397 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 194 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding no Brady violation because "defendants had substantial opportunity to use the documents and to cure any prejudice caused by the delayed disclosure"
U.S. v. Garcia
400 F.3d 816 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 88 times
Holding that, because "[a]iding and abetting is simply one means of committing a single crime," it "does not matter whether some jurors found that [the defendant] performed these acts himself, and others that he intended to help someone else who did"
U.S. v. Ramirez-Martinez
273 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 90 times
Holding that application of the enhancement was appropriate where the defendant transported twenty people in a van without seats or seat belts
U.S. v. Culliton
328 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 66 times
Holding that context and extrinsic evidence are considerations relevant to whether a question on a form is fundamentally ambiguous
United States v. Robinson
651 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1981) Cited 126 times
Holding that incorporation of a conspiracy count by reference in subsequent counts of wire and mail fraud did not render either duplicitous where indictment identified the one specific incident upon which each fraud count was based
U.S. v. Bussell
414 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 61 times
Holding that court did not abuse discretion because although court's jury instructions differed from defendant's proposed instructions in their precise formulation, they adequately presented her defense
U.S. v. Holley
942 F.2d 916 (5th Cir. 1991) Cited 90 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the materiality of statements given in a civil deposition is not limited to issues specifically raised at trial or evidence admissible at trial, but includes matters properly the subject of and material to a deposition under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)
Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally
18 U.S.C. § 1001 Cited 7,329 times 300 Legal Analyses
Making false statements
Section 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally
18 U.S.C. § 1503 Cited 2,508 times 17 Legal Analyses
Relating to obstruction of justice
Section 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court
18 U.S.C. § 1623 Cited 1,628 times 9 Legal Analyses
Criminalizing false statements under oath in judicial proceedings
Section 912 - Officer or employee of the United States
18 U.S.C. § 912 Cited 353 times 2 Legal Analyses
Making it a crime to falsely impersonate a federal officer

USA v. Bonds

24 Cited authorities

Holding that the perjury statute does not apply to literally true but unresponsive answers

Holding that dispute over trial tactics "is not a sufficient conflict to warrant substitution of counsel"

Holding that the government may prove knowledge of the warrant by inference

Holding no Brady violation because "defendants had substantial opportunity to use the documents and to cure any prejudice caused by the delayed disclosure"

Holding that, because "[a]iding and abetting is simply one means of committing a single crime," it "does not matter whether some jurors found that [the defendant] performed these acts himself, and others that he intended to help someone else who did"

Holding that application of the enhancement was appropriate where the defendant transported twenty people in a van without seats or seat belts

Holding that context and extrinsic evidence are considerations relevant to whether a question on a form is fundamentally ambiguous

Holding that incorporation of a conspiracy count by reference in subsequent counts of wire and mail fraud did not render either duplicitous where indictment identified the one specific incident upon which each fraud count was based

Holding that court did not abuse discretion because although court's jury instructions differed from defendant's proposed instructions in their precise formulation, they adequately presented her defense

Holding that the materiality of statements given in a civil deposition is not limited to issues specifically raised at trial or evidence admissible at trial, but includes matters properly the subject of and material to a deposition under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)

Making false statements

Relating to obstruction of justice

Criminalizing false statements under oath in judicial proceedings

Making it a crime to falsely impersonate a federal officer