9 Cited authorities

Salinas v. United States
522 U.S. 52 (1997) Cited 1,213 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the canon of construction requiring a clear statement to alter the federal-state balance of criminal jurisdiction "does not warrant a departure from terms" where the statute's "text . . . is unambiguous on the point under consideration"
Reves v. Ernst Young
507 U.S. 170 (1993) Cited 1,419 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the defendant "participates" if he "directs" the pattern of racketeering activity
U.S. v. Viola
35 F.3d 37 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 152 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Rule 52(b) is applicable when source of plain error is a supervening decision
United States v. Amen
831 F.2d 373 (2d Cir. 1987) Cited 177 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that routine monitoring and recording of the calls of convicted prisoners does not violate the prisoners' Fourth Amendment rights
U.S. v. Elfgeeh
515 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2008) Cited 82 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a forfeiture was not excessive when the record was silent with respect to the fourth factor but the "other three reveal that the . . . forfeiture . . . is not disproportional"
U.S. v. Talebnejad
460 F.3d 563 (4th Cir. 2006) Cited 22 times
Holding that a defendant need not have knowledge of licensing requirements, but need only have knowledge that he or she is operating a money transmitting business
Section 1962 - Prohibited activities
18 U.S.C. § 1962 Cited 15,966 times 60 Legal Analyses
Specifying prohibited activities
Section 848 - Continuing criminal enterprise
21 U.S.C. § 848 Cited 4,078 times 30 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the court's authority in certain situations to "impose a sentence, other than death, authorized by law"
Section 1960 - Prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses
18 U.S.C. § 1960 Cited 301 times 44 Legal Analyses
Referring to "the transportation or transmission of funds that are known to the defendant to have been derived from a criminal offense or are intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity"

USA v. Banki

9 Cited authorities

Holding that the canon of construction requiring a clear statement to alter the federal-state balance of criminal jurisdiction "does not warrant a departure from terms" where the statute's "text . . . is unambiguous on the point under consideration"

Holding that the defendant "participates" if he "directs" the pattern of racketeering activity

Holding that Rule 52(b) is applicable when source of plain error is a supervening decision

Holding that routine monitoring and recording of the calls of convicted prisoners does not violate the prisoners' Fourth Amendment rights

Holding that a forfeiture was not excessive when the record was silent with respect to the fourth factor but the "other three reveal that the . . . forfeiture . . . is not disproportional"

Holding that a defendant need not have knowledge of licensing requirements, but need only have knowledge that he or she is operating a money transmitting business

Specifying prohibited activities

Recognizing the court's authority in certain situations to "impose a sentence, other than death, authorized by law"

Referring to "the transportation or transmission of funds that are known to the defendant to have been derived from a criminal offense or are intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity"