32 Cited authorities

  1. Astrue v. Ratliff

    560 U.S. 586 (2010)   Cited 8,275 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an award of fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), is payable to the litigant, not to the attorney, and thus is available to offset a debt to the government
  2. Reeves v. Astrue

    526 F.3d 732 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 376 times
    Holding that under EAJA "attorney's fees are awarded to the prevailing party, not to the prevailing party's attorney"
  3. Lockhart v. United States

    546 U.S. 142 (2005)   Cited 102 times
    Holding that the previous 10-year limit in the Debt Collection Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3716(e), did not bar offsetting Social Security benefits to repay federally-reinsured student loans
  4. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.

    332 U.S. 234 (1947)   Cited 351 times
    Holding "laborers and materialmen" did not have enforceable rights against the United States
  5. U.S. v. Sawyer

    521 F.3d 792 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that where the defendant lacks "the ability to pay immediately," § 3664(f) "require ... judges to set schedules for repayment from future earnings and other income once they leave prison," although the error does not "affect substantial rights" for purposes of plain error review under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b)
  6. U.S. v. Perry

    360 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the "Intervenor has undoubtedly suffered an injury in fact because the district court vacated Intervenor's property interest [obtained in a restitution order] after it had been secured by the judgment lien"
  7. U.S. v. Cohen

    459 F.3d 490 (4th Cir. 2006)   Cited 107 times
    Holding that because the district court's restitution award was within the scope of the court's authority under the Restitution Act, the defendant's challenge to the amount of restitution ordered fell within the scope of his appeal waiver
  8. U.S. v. Monzel

    641 F.3d 528 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that § 3771(d)'s requirement is not jurisdictional
  9. U.S. v. James

    312 F. Supp. 2d 802 (E.D. Va. 2004)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that "ERISA is no bar to garnishment of a qualified pension plan to collect a criminal restitution order" in rejecting a defendant's motion to quash a garnishment writ seeking to collect MVRA restitution payments
  10. U.S. v. Lawrence

    538 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (D.S.D. 2008)   Cited 47 times
    Holding that "consideration of Defendant's financial situation and/or the equities of the case are not subject to or within the purview of a garnishment hearing."
  11. Section 3664 - Procedure for issuance and enforcement of order of restitution

    18 U.S.C. § 3664   Cited 18,062 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government bears "burden of demonstrating" victim loss "as a result of the offense"
  12. Section 3613 - Civil remedies for satisfaction of an unpaid fine

    18 U.S.C. § 3613   Cited 5,255 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting the United States the power to enforce restitution "in accordance with the practices and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment under Federal law or State law ."
  13. Section 3663A - Mandatory restitution to victims of certain crimes

    18 U.S.C. § 3663A   Cited 5,234 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Granting these categories of restitution to victims "in any case"
  14. Section 6402 - Authority to make credits or refunds

    26 U.S.C. § 6402   Cited 747 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Secretary authority to credit an overpayment to any tax liability
  15. Section 3716 - Administrative offset

    31 U.S.C. § 3716   Cited 725 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing an agency whose debt collection attempts are unsuccessful to “collect the claim by administrative offset”
  16. Section 3701 - Definitions and application

    31 U.S.C. § 3701   Cited 188 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Defining "nontax" debts as any debts "other than [debts] ... under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986."
  17. Section 3003 - Rules of construction

    28 U.S.C. § 3003   Cited 110 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the FDCPA "shall preempt State law to the extent such law is inconsistent with a provision of this chapter"
  18. Section 285.5 - Centralized offset of Federal payments to collect nontax debts owed to the United States

    31 C.F.R. § 285.5   Cited 150 times
    Holding that "all Federal payments are eligible for offset under this section" unless explicitly excepted in (e), which does not apply to travel reimbursements
  19. Section 11.4 - Purpose and scope

    28 C.F.R. § 11.4

    (a)Purpose. The purpose of this subpart is to implement 5 U.S.C. 5514 and 31 U.S.C. 3716 , which authorize the collection by salary or administrative offset of debts owed by persons, organizations, or entities to the federal government. This subpart is consistent with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations on salary offset, codified at 5 CFR part 550, subpart K, and with regulations on administrative offset contained within the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), 31 CFR part