§Why CasetextPricing

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SUM OF $70,990,605 et al

MOTION to Stay

9 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN SUNTRUST ACC. NU

    456 F. Supp. 2d 64 (D.D.C. 2006)   Cited 28 times

    Civil Action No. 05-2497 (RMC). October 12, 2006. Laurel Loomis Rimon, United States Attorney's Office, Criminal Division, William Rakestraw Cowden, U.S. Attorney's Office, Kimberly Kiefer Peretti, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Andrew S. Ittleman, Rodriguez O'Donnell Ross Fuerst, Miami, FL, for Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A STAY COLLYER, District Judge. This is a civil forfeiture case in which the Government asks the Court to stay the litigation

  2. U.S. v. Funds Deposited in Account No. 200008524845

    162 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (D. Wyo. 2001)   Cited 20 times
    Granting a stay after reviewing the claimants' existing discovery requests and the government's ex parte submissions

  3. U.S. v. One Assortment of Seventy-Three Firearms

    352 F. Supp. 2d 2 (D. Me. 2005)   Cited 13 times

    Civ. No. 04-188-P-C. January 5, 2005. Donald E. Clark, Office of the U.S., Attorney, District of Maine, Portland, ME, for USA, Plaintiff. Richard S. Berne, Berne Lafond, Paul M. Boots, Paul M. Boots, P.A., Portland, ME, for Stanley Joyce, Faith Hope Charity, Claimants. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 981(G) GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge. Before the Court for action at this time is the joint Motion of the parties herein seeking the Court's Order staying

  4. Anton v. Prospect Cafe Milano, Inc.

    233 F.R.D. 216 (D.D.C. 2006)   Cited 5 times

    Patrick M. Regan, Athanasios Basdekis, Paul J. Cornoni, Jonathan E. Halperin, Regan, Halperin & Long PLLC, Washington, DC, Steven M. Frei, Hall, Sickels, Frei, Kattenburg, P.C., Reston, VA, for Plaintiff. Joseph L. Beavers, Daniel R. Lanier, Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Baltimore, MD, Benjamin S. Boyd, Piper Rudnick LLP, Washington, DC, Christopher Bryan Amolsch, Fairfax, VA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION URBINA, District Judge. DENYING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL I. INTRODUCTION Early in the

  5. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,908 times   660 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  6. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 12,050 times   172 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"

  7. Section 881 - Forfeitures

    21 U.S.C. § 881   Cited 4,882 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Adopting five-year statute of limitations of 19 U.S.C. § 1621

  8. Section 981 - Civil forfeiture

    18 U.S.C. § 981   Cited 3,737 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Adopting 19 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq.

  9. Section 1957 - Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

    18 U.S.C. § 1957   Cited 3,291 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Finding an error in the trial court's jury instructions harmless "[b]ecause overwhelming evidence support[ed] the jury's finding" of guilt