11 Cited authorities

Powers v. Ohio
499 U.S. 400 (1991) Cited 2,545 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a white defendant has standing to challenge strikes of black jurors
Duren v. Missouri
439 U.S. 357 (1979) Cited 2,298 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that underrepresentation was systematic where the jury questionnaire permitted women, but not men, to opt out of jury service
Taylor v. Louisiana
419 U.S. 522 (1975) Cited 2,231 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding unconstitutional a state statute that excluded women from jury service unless they had previously filed written declaration indicating their desire to serve
U.S. v. Ovalle
136 F.3d 1092 (6th Cir. 1998) Cited 91 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the procedure, which struck every fifth non-African-American from the jury wheel, violated the Jury Selection and Service Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution
Smith v. Berghuis
543 F.3d 326 (6th Cir. 2008) Cited 30 times
In Smith, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dealt with the State of Michigan's jury selection process, not that of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
Jefferson v. Morgan
962 F.2d 1185 (6th Cir. 1992) Cited 32 times
Holding that a 12.6% disparity, with African Americans comprising 18.5% of the populace but only 5.9% of grand jurors, was "sufficiently large" to establish unlawful discrimination
U.S. v. Green
389 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D. Mass. 2005) Cited 10 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that "substantial failure" does not require prejudice
Section 3006A - Adequate representation of defendants
18 U.S.C. § 3006A Cited 17,661 times 13 Legal Analyses
Granting defendants an ex parte forum to request reimbursement for supplemental services
Section 1861 - Declaration of policy
28 U.S.C. § 1861 Cited 994 times 1 Legal Analyses
Codifying the right to "juries selected at random from a fair cross section of the community in the district or division wherein the court convenes"
Section 1867 - Challenging compliance with selection procedures
28 U.S.C. § 1867 Cited 595 times 2 Legal Analyses
Requiring timely objection in civil cases to preserve issues under the Jury Selection Act
Section 1863 - Plan for random jury selection
28 U.S.C. § 1863 Cited 423 times
Permitting excuses for "undue hardship"

United States of America v. Rosendall

11 Cited authorities

Holding that a white defendant has standing to challenge strikes of black jurors

Holding that underrepresentation was systematic where the jury questionnaire permitted women, but not men, to opt out of jury service

Holding unconstitutional a state statute that excluded women from jury service unless they had previously filed written declaration indicating their desire to serve

Holding that the procedure, which struck every fifth non-African-American from the jury wheel, violated the Jury Selection and Service Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution

In Smith, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dealt with the State of Michigan's jury selection process, not that of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Holding that a 12.6% disparity, with African Americans comprising 18.5% of the populace but only 5.9% of grand jurors, was "sufficiently large" to establish unlawful discrimination

Recognizing that "substantial failure" does not require prejudice

Granting defendants an ex parte forum to request reimbursement for supplemental services

Codifying the right to "juries selected at random from a fair cross section of the community in the district or division wherein the court convenes"

Requiring timely objection in civil cases to preserve issues under the Jury Selection Act

Permitting excuses for "undue hardship"