§Why CasetextPricing

United States of America v. Race Horse Named Shanon Nicole Net Sale Proceeds in the amount of 195772.50 et al

MOTION to Stay

11 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN SUNTRUST ACC. NU

    456 F. Supp. 2d 64 (D.D.C. 2006)   Cited 28 times

    Civil Action No. 05-2497 (RMC). October 12, 2006. Laurel Loomis Rimon, United States Attorney's Office, Criminal Division, William Rakestraw Cowden, U.S. Attorney's Office, Kimberly Kiefer Peretti, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Andrew S. Ittleman, Rodriguez O'Donnell Ross Fuerst, Miami, FL, for Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A STAY COLLYER, District Judge. This is a civil forfeiture case in which the Government asks the Court to stay the litigation

  2. U.S. v. Funds Deposited in Account No. 200008524845

    162 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (D. Wyo. 2001)   Cited 20 times
    Granting a stay after reviewing the claimants' existing discovery requests and the government's ex parte submissions

  3. U.S. v. One Assortment of Seventy-Three Firearms

    352 F. Supp. 2d 2 (D. Me. 2005)   Cited 13 times

    Civ. No. 04-188-P-C. January 5, 2005. Donald E. Clark, Office of the U.S., Attorney, District of Maine, Portland, ME, for USA, Plaintiff. Richard S. Berne, Berne Lafond, Paul M. Boots, Paul M. Boots, P.A., Portland, ME, for Stanley Joyce, Faith Hope Charity, Claimants. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 981(G) GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge. Before the Court for action at this time is the joint Motion of the parties herein seeking the Court's Order staying

  4. U.S. v. ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN BUS. MARKET ACCT

    319 F. Supp. 2d 290 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 10 times
    Granting a stay after reviewing a government submission that "demonstrated that allowing civil discovery to proceed will impede the criminal investigation and prosecution"

  5. U.S. v. Contents of Nationwide Life Ins. Acct. 0961

    NO. 1:05-CV-00196 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2007)   Cited 2 times

    NO. 1:05-CV-00196. March 1, 2007 OPINION AND ORDER S. SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge This matter is before the Court on Claimant Steven Warshak's Motion to Reconsider, Amend, and Vacate Order Staying Case and Denying Due Process Hearing (doc. 214), the government's Response in Opposition (doc. 217), and Claimant's Reply (doc. 219). Also before the Court is the government's Response to the Court's Inquiry at December 27, 2006 Conference (doc. 216), and Warshak's Reply (doc. 218). I. Claimant's Motion

  6. Section 1341 - Frauds and swindles

    18 U.S.C. § 1341   Cited 13,418 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Relating to mail fraud

  7. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 11,981 times   170 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"

  8. Section 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments

    18 U.S.C. § 1956   Cited 9,304 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Defining “specified unlawful activity” to include, inter alia, controlled substance violations, murder, bribery, smuggling, various forms of fraud, concealment of assets, various environmental offenses, and health care offenses

  9. Section 981 - Civil forfeiture

    18 U.S.C. § 981   Cited 3,722 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Adopting 19 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq.

  10. Section 1957 - Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

    18 U.S.C. § 1957   Cited 3,270 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Finding an error in the trial court's jury instructions harmless "[b]ecause overwhelming evidence support[ed] the jury's finding" of guilt

  11. Section 664 - Theft or embezzlement from employee benefit plan

    18 U.S.C. § 664   Cited 329 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare funds