United States v. Belfield
692 F.2d 141 (D.C. Cir. 1982) Cited 65 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming that the "decision to pass upon the legality of the surveillance based upon an ex parte examination of an in camera" submission "[i]s in keeping with the procedures contemplated by Congress when it enacted FISA."
United States v. Ott
827 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1987) Cited 43 timesHolding that, in a military criminal trial, the government's use of classified information, without permitting the defendant or his lawyers to view the information, did not violate the defendant's due process rights
United States v. Ott
637 F. Supp. 62 (E.D. Cal. 1986) Cited 5 timesRejecting motion for disclosure and finding § 1806(f)'s provision for ex parte and in camera review constitutional
Section 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
18 U.S.C. § 793 Cited 186 times 3 Legal AnalysesReferring to § 793 "for the purpose aforesaid"
Section 1806 - Use of information
50 U.S.C. § 1806 Cited 169 times 4 Legal AnalysesAllowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"
Section 934 - Art. 134. General article
10 U.S.C. § 934 Cited 168 times 3 Legal AnalysesProhibiting conduct which is of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, or conduct which is prejudicial to good order and discipline
Section 906 - Art. 106. Impersonation of officer, noncommissioned or petty officer, or agent or official
10 U.S.C. § 906 Cited 5 timesSpying in time of war