16 Cited authorities

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.
510 U.S. 517 (1994) Cited 2,836 times 30 Legal Analyses
Holding that under the Copyright Act fee-shifting statute, 17 U.S.C. § 505, defendants and plaintiffs are to be treated the same, contrary to the Court's interpretation of § 1988
Howlett v. Rose
496 U.S. 356 (1990) Cited 1,377 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the State and arms of the State . . . are not subject to suit under § 1983"
Bogan v. Scott-Harris
523 U.S. 44 (1998) Cited 931 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that local executive officials could invoke legislative immunity with respect to their legitimate legislative acts
Martinez v. California
444 U.S. 277 (1980) Cited 1,406 times
Holding that the language of § 1983 imposes a proximate cause requirement on claims under that statute
Fantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty
984 F.2d 1524 (9th Cir. 1993) Cited 1,365 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court properly struck lengthy, stale and previously litigated factual allegations to streamline the action
Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Gilmore
252 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2001) Cited 683 times
Holding that motions to strike are "generally viewed with disfavor because striking a portion of a pleading is a drastic remedy
United States v. Brewster
408 U.S. 501 (1972) Cited 432 times
Holding that act of bribery was not immune from prosecution if government did not need to prove "how [defendant] spoke, how he debated, how he voted, or anything he did in the chamber or in committee"
Wallis v. Spencer
202 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 404 times
Holding that there was a genuine factual dispute over the "imminency" of the danger to a child based on allegations that the child's father intended to ritually sacrifice him to Satan the following week
San Pedro Hotel Co., Inc. v. City of L.A
159 F.3d 470 (9th Cir. 1998) Cited 412 times
Holding that a genuine issue of material fact existed on the plaintiff's retaliation claim where the plaintiff had introduced evidence that, several weeks after publicly stating "that the City had acted illegally by refusing to fund housing for the mentally ill and that his family would sue . . . the City of Los Angeles Building and Safety Commissioner and several members of the City's `Slumhouse Task Force' conducted an inspection" of the plaintiff's hotel, cited him for violations, and gave him only a short time to make repairs
United States v. Johnson
383 U.S. 169 (1966) Cited 298 times
Holding a criminal prosecution for bribery could not inquire into a legislator's motive for legislative action under the Speech or Debate Clause
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 348,148 times 927 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 6212 - Notice of deficiency
26 U.S.C. § 6212 Cited 1,805 times 26 Legal Analyses
Authorizing "the Secretary" to issue NODs
Section 7401 - Authorization
26 U.S.C. § 7401 Cited 511 times 2 Legal Analyses
Providing that "no civil action for the collection or recovery of taxes, or of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, shall be commenced unless the Secretary authorizes or sanctions the proceedings and the Attorney General or his delegate directs that the action be commenced"
Section 7-1026 - PLEADINGS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS
Idaho Code § 7-1026 Cited 1 times
(1) In a proceeding under this chapter, a petitioner seeking to establish a support order, to determine parentage of a child, or to register and modify a support order of a tribunal of another state or a foreign country must file a petition. Unless otherwise ordered under section 7-1027, Idaho Code, the petition or accompanying documents must provide, so far as known, the name, residential address and social security numbers of the obligor and the obligee or the parent and alleged parent, and the

United States of America v. Hart et al

16 Cited authorities

Holding that under the Copyright Act fee-shifting statute, 17 U.S.C. § 505, defendants and plaintiffs are to be treated the same, contrary to the Court's interpretation of § 1988

Holding that "the State and arms of the State . . . are not subject to suit under § 1983"

Holding that local executive officials could invoke legislative immunity with respect to their legitimate legislative acts

Holding that the language of § 1983 imposes a proximate cause requirement on claims under that statute

Holding that the district court properly struck lengthy, stale and previously litigated factual allegations to streamline the action

Holding that motions to strike are "generally viewed with disfavor because striking a portion of a pleading is a drastic remedy

Holding that act of bribery was not immune from prosecution if government did not need to prove "how [defendant] spoke, how he debated, how he voted, or anything he did in the chamber or in committee"

Holding that there was a genuine factual dispute over the "imminency" of the danger to a child based on allegations that the child's father intended to ritually sacrifice him to Satan the following week

Holding a criminal prosecution for bribery could not inquire into a legislator's motive for legislative action under the Speech or Debate Clause

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Authorizing "the Secretary" to issue NODs

Providing that "no civil action for the collection or recovery of taxes, or of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, shall be commenced unless the Secretary authorizes or sanctions the proceedings and the Attorney General or his delegate directs that the action be commenced"