Holding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."
Holding that an injunction provision that required abortion protestors to move away from abortion clinic patients who asked to be left alone did not violate the First Amendment
Holding appeals court's scope of review is "quite narrow" when considering whether a district court properly admitted expert testimony in a bench trial
Finding the racially inflammatory "evidence offered [was] clearly was probative of [the defendant's] state of mind and tend[ed] to counter his allegation of benign purpose."
Imposing criminal liability on anyone who "intentionally damages or destroys the property of a facility, or attempts to do so, because such facility provides reproductive health services"