35 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,796 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,848 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Badaracco v. Commissioner

    464 U.S. 386 (1984)   Cited 436 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an amended return is a creature of administrative origin and grace"
  4. Cole v. Homier Distributing Co.

    599 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 427 times
    Finding that "lost-profit damages cannot rest upon mere speculation" and affirming an expert's exclusion where the expert's twenty-five-year damage term was speculative because the parties could terminate the contract with ninety-days' notice and there was no indication it would continue for twenty-five years
  5. BP America Production Co. ex rel. Amoco Production Co. v. Burton

    549 U.S. 84 (2006)   Cited 131 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lessees must treat gas to pipeline CO2 requirements to serve distant markets into which it is sold
  6. Nat. Parks v. Tennessee

    480 F.3d 410 (6th Cir. 2007)   Cited 84 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Tennessee SIP imposed ongoing operational obligations and avoiding the necessity of any statutory analysis of § 7475 itself
  7. New York v. U.S.E.P.A

    413 F.3d 3 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 75 times
    Finding waiver in petitioner's failure to raise argument in its opening brief
  8. U.S. v. Marine Shale Processors

    81 F.3d 1329 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 92 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding affirmative misconduct requires "that at minimum the official must intentionally or recklessly mislead the estoppel claimant"
  9. Sierra Club v. Otter Tail Power Co.

    615 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 56 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where Sierra Club "essentially attack[ed] the terms of [defendant's] amended Title V permit rather than [defendant's] compliance with the permit," district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the CAA vests judicial review of administrative permitting process exclusively in the courts of appeal
  10. E.I. Dupont de Nemours Co. v. Davis

    264 U.S. 456 (1924)   Cited 208 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that train-loading-delay claims that arose while the government was operating a railroad pursuant to a wartime seizure were exempt from the statute of limitations
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,487 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,896 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 27,718 times   285 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard
  14. Section 1365 - Citizen suits

    33 U.S.C. § 1365   Cited 2,266 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Granting Administrator right to intervene in citizen suits
  15. Section 2462 - Time for commencing proceedings

    28 U.S.C. § 2462   Cited 718 times   262 Legal Analyses
    Allowing exception to five-year limitations period where Congress has provided otherwise
  16. Section 7475 - Preconstruction requirements

    42 U.S.C. § 7475   Cited 231 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Requiring permits for "the construction and operation" of certain facilities
  17. Section 7411 - Standards of performance for new stationary sources

    42 U.S.C. § 7411   Cited 217 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to the EPA to designate the best system and determine achievable degree of emissions reduction
  18. Section 643.055 - Commission may adopt rules for compliance with federal law - suspension, reinstatement - exemption, limitations - regulation of residential wood burning heaters or appliances prohibited without legislative authorization

    Mo. Rev. Stat. § 643.055   Cited 2 times

    1. Other provisions of law notwithstanding, the Missouri air conservation commission shall have the authority to promulgate rules and regulations, pursuant to chapter 536, to establish standards and guidelines to ensure that the state of Missouri is in compliance with the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. Section 7401, et seq.). The standards and guidelines so established shall not be any stricter than those required under the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act,

  19. Section 52.21 - Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality

    40 C.F.R. § 52.21   Cited 216 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Providing minimum federal standards upon plan disapproval
  20. Section 10 CSR 10-6.060 - Construction Permits Required

    Mo. Code Regs. tit. 10 § 10-6.060   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses

    PURPOSE: This rule defines sources required to obtain permits to construct. It establishes: requirements to be met prior to construction or modification of any sources; a procedure for a source to voluntarily obtain a permit for implementing practically enforceable conditions; a procedure for the permitting authority to issue general permits; permit fees; and public notice requirements for certain permits. This proposed amendment will remove erroneous references to incorporation by reference information

  21. Section 10 CSR 10-6.065 - Operating Permits

    Mo. Code Regs. tit. 10 § 10-6.065   Cited 6 times

    PURPOSE: This rule defines air con taminant sources which are required to obtain operating permits and establishes procedures for obtaining and complying with operating permits; it does not establish any air quality standards or guidelines. PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The secretary of state has determined that the publication of the entire text of the material which is incorporated by reference as a portion of this rule would be unduly cumbersome or expensive. This material as incorporated by reference in

  22. Section 74:36:05:02 - Part 70 operating permit required

    S.D. Admin. R. 74:36:05:02   Cited 1 times

    A person may not operate any source or unit likely to cause the emission of air pollutants into the ambient air or any equipment which prevents or controls the emission of air pollutants into the ambient air until a construction permit, PSD preconstruction permit, NSR preconstruction permit, or Part 70 operating permit has been issued by the board or the secretary. S.D. Admin. R. 74:36:05:02 19 SDR 157, effective 4/22/1993; second paragraph transferred from General Authority: SDCL 34A-1-6, 34A-1-21