39 Cited authorities

Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (1983) Cited 19,052 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"
Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.
519 U.S. 337 (1997) Cited 2,479 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII
United States v. Bajakajian
524 U.S. 321 (1998) Cited 1,362 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that forfeiture 70 times the Guidelines maximum and greater than the statutory maximum would be unconstitutionally excessive
Russello v. United States
464 U.S. 16 (1983) Cited 2,100 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"
United States v. Ursery
518 U.S. 267 (1996) Cited 963 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that 19 U.S.C. § 1615 "governs the burden of proof in forfeiture proceedings under §§ 881 and 981"
Hibbs v. Winn
542 U.S. 88 (2004) Cited 575 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[b]ecause [28 U.S.C.] § 2101(c)'s 90-day limit [for petition for certiorari] had not yet expired, the clock could still be reset"
Libretti v. United States
516 U.S. 29 (1995) Cited 553 times
Holding that § 853(n) suffices to protect third parties' rights
Haig v. Agee
453 U.S. 280 (1981) Cited 461 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that absence of historical practice does not preclude executive from exercising power in new or novel scenarios
U.S. v. Amer. Trucking Ass'ns
310 U.S. 534 (1940) Cited 1,666 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"
United States v. Hassan
742 F.3d 104 (4th Cir. 2014) Cited 221 times
Holding that Facebook records were properly authenticated where screenshots contained the defendant's user profiles, biographical information, and photographs and the account was linked to the defendant's email address via internet protocol addresses
Section 981 - Civil forfeiture
18 U.S.C. § 981 Cited 3,736 times 33 Legal Analyses
Adopting 19 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq.
Section 983 - General rules for civil forfeiture proceedings
18 U.S.C. § 983 Cited 2,801 times 8 Legal Analyses
Noting that for purposes of the innocent owner defense to civil forfeiture, "no person may assert an ownership interest under this subsection in contraband or other property that it is illegal to possess"
Section 1963 - Criminal penalties
18 U.S.C. § 1963 Cited 1,323 times 8 Legal Analyses
Permitting substitution where property forfeitable under § 1963 has been dissipated

United States of America v. All Monies, Including Insurance Benefits and Interest, Payable Pursuant to Claim Number 1179068 Under Minnesota Life Insurance Group Policy No. 33772-G, for Basic Life Insurance Coverage in the Amount

39 Cited authorities

Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"

Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

Holding that forfeiture 70 times the Guidelines maximum and greater than the statutory maximum would be unconstitutionally excessive

Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"

Holding that 19 U.S.C. § 1615 "governs the burden of proof in forfeiture proceedings under §§ 881 and 981"

Holding that "[b]ecause [28 U.S.C.] § 2101(c)'s 90-day limit [for petition for certiorari] had not yet expired, the clock could still be reset"

Holding that § 853(n) suffices to protect third parties' rights

Holding that absence of historical practice does not preclude executive from exercising power in new or novel scenarios

Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"

Holding that Facebook records were properly authenticated where screenshots contained the defendant's user profiles, biographical information, and photographs and the account was linked to the defendant's email address via internet protocol addresses

Adopting 19 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq.

Noting that for purposes of the innocent owner defense to civil forfeiture, "no person may assert an ownership interest under this subsection in contraband or other property that it is illegal to possess"

Permitting substitution where property forfeitable under § 1963 has been dissipated