8 Cited authorities

  1. Gilmour v. Gates, McDonald and Co.

    382 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 1,253 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding claim raised in brief in opposition to summary judgment was not before the court on appeal because it was not in the complaint
  2. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

    745 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 2,359 times
    Holding that a complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss
  3. U.S. ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp.

    290 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2002)   Cited 816 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding Rule 9(b) applies to False Claims Act claims
  4. Macuba v. Deboer

    193 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 669 times
    Holding that Rule 56(e), now Rule 56(c), "also applies to testimony given on deposition"
  5. Focus on the Family v. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Auth.

    344 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2003)   Cited 551 times
    Holding standing established at time complaint is filed
  6. Atkins v. McInteer

    470 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 489 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denial of leave to amend was not an abuse of discretion where the relator “failed to include the proposed amendment or the substance thereof” with his request
  7. United States v. Science Applications International Corp.

    626 F.3d 1257 (D.C. Cir. 2010)   Cited 203 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding monthly invoice qualified as a false claim under the FCA
  8. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,855 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"