§Why CasetextPricing

United States of America et al v. Microsoft Corporation

RESPONSE to Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Memorandum in Support of the Second Revised Proposed Final Judgment

44 Cited authorities

  1. Lewis v. Casey

    518 U.S. 343 (1996)   Cited 14,301 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prisoner must show an actual injury to state a claim for denial of access to courts

  2. Pierce v. Underwood

    487 U.S. 552 (1988)   Cited 9,100 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when Congress reenacts a statute without changing its language, and when there is no indication that “Congress thought it was doing anything ... except reenacting and making permanent” the earlier legislation, a court should not give weight to legislative history pertaining to the reenactment

  3. Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine

    395 U.S. 100 (1969)   Cited 2,448 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court erred when it enjoined a nonparty that was never determined to be in active concert with a defendant

  4. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.

    345 U.S. 629 (1953)   Cited 2,224 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, although defendant had "disclaimed any intention" to revive the challenged conduct, "[s]uch a profession does not suffice to make a case moot although it is one of the factors to be considered in determining the appropriateness of granting an injunction against the now-discontinued acts"

  5. National Soc. of Professional Engineers v. U.S.

    435 U.S. 679 (1978)   Cited 743 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding agreement among engineers to refuse to discuss prices with potential customers until after the initial selection of an engineer was per se illegal

  6. United States v. Apfelbaum

    445 U.S. 115 (1980)   Cited 306 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[n]either the [federal use] immunity statute nor the Fifth Amendment precludes the use of respondent's immunized testimony at a subsequent prosecution for making false statements"

  7. U.S. v. Microsoft Corp.

    253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 512 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district courts are not required to conduct evidentiary hearings prior to issuing relief in civil cases when "there are no disputed factual issues regarding the matter of relief

  8. Caminetti v. United States

    242 U.S. 470 (1917)   Cited 1,907 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that importation of a woman for immoral purposes may constitutionally be regulated even when it is not for material gain

  9. Maryland v. United States

    460 U.S. 1001 (1983)   Cited 213 times
    Approving consent decree that set in train lengthy judicial oversight of divestiture of telephone monopoly

  10. United States v. Oregon State Medical Society

    343 U.S. 326 (1952)   Cited 495 times
    Finding "not the slightest reason to doubt the genuineness, good faith or permanence of the changed attitude and strategy of these defendant-appellees," as evidenced by "an overt and visible reversal of policy, carried out by extensive operations which have every appearance of being permanent"

  11. Section 16 - Judgments

    15 U.S.C. § 16   Cited 711 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Tolling the clock on private antitrust suits "during the pendency" of related suits by the federal government and "for one year thereafter"

  12. Section 516 - Conduct of litigation reserved to Department of Justice

    28 U.S.C. § 516   Cited 335 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General and the Department of Justice exclusive power to direct litigation involving the United States