51 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 217,065 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Rockwell Int'l Corp. et al. v. United States

    549 U.S. 457 (2007)   Cited 806 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "allegations" as used in § 3730(e) "is not limited to the allegations in the original complaint" and "includes (at a minimum) the allegations in the original complaint as amended"
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney

    442 U.S. 256 (1979)   Cited 2,074 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause is implicated only when "a state legislatur[e] selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part `because of,' not merely `in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group"
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services

    467 U.S. 51 (1984)   Cited 1,277 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Medicare provider was responsible for familiarizing itself with the legal requirements of cost reimbursement and obtaining an agency interpretation of the applicable regulations
  5. Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co., Inc.

    357 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2,123 times
    Finding that the district court's inadvertent disregard of consumer survey research required vacatur of summary judgment against seller on his claim alleging false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act and noting that "consumer survey research often is a key part of a Lanham Act claim alleging that an advertisement is misleading or deceptive"
  6. Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co.

    302 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,171 times
    Holding that "[a]n employee is not required to use any particular language when requesting an accommodation but need only inform the employer of the need for an adjustment due to a medical condition." (cleaned up)
  7. Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond

    496 U.S. 414 (1990)   Cited 796 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "judicial use of the equitable doctrine of estoppel cannot grant . . . a money remedy that Congress has not authorized"
  8. U.S. ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp.

    290 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2002)   Cited 822 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding Rule 9(b) applies to False Claims Act claims
  9. Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLC

    456 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2006)   Cited 692 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a written warning is not an adverse employment action if it does not cause a significant change in employment status
  10. Reno v. Bossier Parish School Bd.

    520 U.S. 471 (1997)   Cited 195 times
    Holding that, in cases brought under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Arlington Heights framework should guide a court's inquiry into whether a jurisdiction had a discriminatory purpose in enacting a voting change
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,994 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 3729 - False claims

    31 U.S.C. § 3729   Cited 6,769 times   630 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "any person" who knowingly causes false claims to be presented
  13. Section 3730 - Civil actions for false claims

    31 U.S.C. § 3730   Cited 5,404 times   430 Legal Analyses
    Granting the government primary responsibility for conducting suit
  14. Section 1395nn - Limitation on certain physician referrals

    42 U.S.C. § 1395nn   Cited 419 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Approving of compensation rates that " do not exceed fair market value"
  15. Section 516 - Conduct of litigation reserved to Department of Justice

    28 U.S.C. § 516   Cited 335 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General and the Department of Justice exclusive power to direct litigation involving the United States
  16. Section 421.5 - General provisions

    42 C.F.R. § 421.5   Cited 88 times
    Providing that the Medicare Administrator "is the real party of interest in any litigation involving the administration of the program"
  17. Section 411.354 - Financial relationship, compensation, and ownership or investment interest

    42 C.F.R. § 411.354   Cited 35 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Defining a financial relationship to include direct or indirect relationships
  18. Section 411.353 - Prohibition on certain referrals by physicians and limitations on billing

    42 C.F.R. § 411.353   Cited 23 times   27 Legal Analyses

    (a)Prohibition on referrals. Except as provided in this subpart, a physician who has a direct or indirect financial relationship with an entity, or who has an immediate family member who has a direct or indirect financial relationship with the entity, may not make a referral to that entity for the furnishing of DHS for which payment otherwise may be made under Medicare. A physician's prohibited financial relationship with an entity that furnishes DHS is not imputed to his or her group practice or

  19. Section 0.45 - General functions

    28 C.F.R. § 0.45   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Assigning common law fraud claims to the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division
  20. Section 424.520 - Effective date of Medicare billing privileges

    42 C.F.R. § 424.520   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a)Surveyed, certified or accredited providers and suppliers. The effective date for billing privileges for providers and suppliers requiring State survey, certification or accreditation is specified in § 489.13 of this chapter. If a provider or supplier is seeking accreditation from a CMS-approved accreditation organization, the effective date is specified in § 489.13 . (b)Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities. The effective date for billing privileges for IDTFs is specified in § 410.33(i) of