16 Cited authorities

King v. Burwell
574 U.S. 988 (2015) Cited 677 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that Congress did not delegate health insurance policy to Internal Revenue Service
United States v. Windsor
570 U.S. 744 (2013) Cited 675 times 93 Legal Analyses
Holding unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment a federal law recognizing opposite-sex-sex but not same-sex marriages because its "principal purpose [was] to impose inequality, not for other reasons like governmental efficiency"
Freytag v. Commissioner
501 U.S. 868 (1991) Cited 928 times 63 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Tax Court special trial judge is an "inferior officer" even though "special trial judges ... render [final] decisions of the Tax Court in [certain] cases"
Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond
496 U.S. 414 (1990) Cited 796 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "judicial use of the equitable doctrine of estoppel cannot grant . . . a money remedy that Congress has not authorized"
United States v. MacCollom
426 U.S. 317 (1976) Cited 1,211 times
Holding that the statutory conditions of § 753(f) for furnishing a free transcript in § 2255 proceedings are consistent with due process and equal protection
Ariz. State Legislature v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting Comm'n
576 U.S. 787 (2015) Cited 276 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim that a proposition interfered with the Legislature's constitutionally vested power over redistricting established standing
Zivotofsky v. Kerry
576 U.S. 1 (2015) Cited 54 times 1 Legal Analyses
Looking to "prominent international scholars" from "the time of the founding" to elucidate the meaning of the Reception Clause, Article II, section 3, of the Constitution
Committee on Judiciary v. Miers
558 F. Supp. 2d 53 (D.D.C. 2008) Cited 37 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that the House has standing to assert investigatory and oversight authority
Harrington v. Bush
553 F.2d 190 (D.C. Cir. 1977) Cited 83 times
Denying standing to appellant Congressman to challenge alleged illegal use of funds by the CIA in part because the alleged harm "would take place, if at all, at some undetermined time in the future when Congress exercised" a power related to the alleged illegality
Comm. on Oversight & Gov't Reform v. Holder
979 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013) Cited 12 times
Finding that the House committee "is not looking to the Declaratory Judgment Act as the source of the right it is seeking to vindicate in this Court, but rather as the source of the mechanism to achieve the vindication of a right derived elsewhere"
Section 36B - Refundable credit for coverage under a qualified health plan
26 U.S.C. § 36B Cited 80 times 35 Legal Analyses
Providing premium tax credits to make health insurance plans, including employer-sponsored plans, more affordable
Section 18023 - Special rules
42 U.S.C. § 18023 Cited 19 times 3 Legal Analyses
Prohibiting use of the Act's cost-sharing reduction or tax credits for abortion coverage
Section 18071 - Reduced cost-sharing for individuals enrolling in qualified health plans
42 U.S.C. § 18071 Cited 16 times 5 Legal Analyses
Cost-sharing reduction
Section 1324 - Refund of internal revenue collections
31 U.S.C. § 1324 Cited 11 times 5 Legal Analyses
Providing for the appropriation of "[n]ecessary amounts . . . for refunding internal revenue collections"

United States House of Representatives v. Burwell et al

16 Cited authorities

Holding that Congress did not delegate health insurance policy to Internal Revenue Service

Holding unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment a federal law recognizing opposite-sex-sex but not same-sex marriages because its "principal purpose [was] to impose inequality, not for other reasons like governmental efficiency"

Holding that a Tax Court special trial judge is an "inferior officer" even though "special trial judges ... render [final] decisions of the Tax Court in [certain] cases"

Holding that "judicial use of the equitable doctrine of estoppel cannot grant . . . a money remedy that Congress has not authorized"

Holding that the statutory conditions of § 753(f) for furnishing a free transcript in § 2255 proceedings are consistent with due process and equal protection

Holding that a claim that a proposition interfered with the Legislature's constitutionally vested power over redistricting established standing

Looking to "prominent international scholars" from "the time of the founding" to elucidate the meaning of the Reception Clause, Article II, section 3, of the Constitution

Finding that the House has standing to assert investigatory and oversight authority

Denying standing to appellant Congressman to challenge alleged illegal use of funds by the CIA in part because the alleged harm "would take place, if at all, at some undetermined time in the future when Congress exercised" a power related to the alleged illegality

Finding that the House committee "is not looking to the Declaratory Judgment Act as the source of the right it is seeking to vindicate in this Court, but rather as the source of the mechanism to achieve the vindication of a right derived elsewhere"

Providing premium tax credits to make health insurance plans, including employer-sponsored plans, more affordable

Prohibiting use of the Act's cost-sharing reduction or tax credits for abortion coverage

Cost-sharing reduction

Providing for the appropriation of "[n]ecessary amounts . . . for refunding internal revenue collections"