52 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,238 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Scott v. Harris
550 U.S. 372 (2007) Cited 11,730 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that it is at least sometimes reasonable for an officer to intentionally collide with a suspect's vehicle during a pursuit
Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney
442 U.S. 256 (1979) Cited 2,063 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Equal Protection Clause is implicated only when "a state legislatur[e] selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part `because of,' not merely `in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group"
Allison Engine Co. v. U.S. ex Rel. Sanders
553 U.S. 662 (2008) Cited 418 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that an action under subsection requires a relater to allege "that the defendant intended that the false record or statement be material to the Government's decision to pay or approve the false claim"
Moore v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
8 F.3d 335 (6th Cir. 1993) Cited 2,007 times
In Moore, the Supreme Court considered “whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law.
Geiger v. Tower Auto
579 F.3d 614 (6th Cir. 2009) Cited 747 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that employer's preference for another employee was not actionable unless motivated by discriminatory animus
United States ex rel. Thompson v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.
125 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 1997) Cited 676 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an AKS violation may support a claim under the FCA under a false certification theory
Reno v. Bossier Parish School Bd.
520 U.S. 471 (1997) Cited 195 times
Holding that, in cases brought under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Arlington Heights framework should guide a court's inquiry into whether a jurisdiction had a discriminatory purpose in enacting a voting change
U.S. ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess
317 U.S. 537 (1943) Cited 937 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that one who contracts with a local governmental unit to work on federally funded projects can "cheat the United States" through the state intermediary
Aerel, S.R.L. v. PCC Airfoils, L.L.C.
448 F.3d 899 (6th Cir. 2006) Cited 387 times
Holding that a party cannot create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment simply by contradicting his previous sworn statement
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,775 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 Cited 16,085 times 126 Legal Analyses
Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely
Section 3729 - False claims
31 U.S.C. § 3729 Cited 6,735 times 628 Legal Analyses
Holding liable "any person" who knowingly causes false claims to be presented
Section 1395 - Prohibition against any Federal interference
42 U.S.C. § 1395 Cited 2,265 times 29 Legal Analyses
Addressing Medicare's reimbursement for diagnostic laboratory services for hospital outpatients
Section 1320a-7b - Criminal penalties for acts involving Federal health care programs
42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b Cited 1,444 times 314 Legal Analyses
Prohibiting the solicitation or receipt of "remuneration" in exchange for referrals
Section 3731 - False claims procedure
31 U.S.C. § 3731 Cited 582 times 63 Legal Analyses
In § 3731(a), Congress apparently used the phrase "under section 3730" to mean all three § 3730 actions. § 3731(a) (a "subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a trial or hearing conducted under section 3730 of this title may be served at any place in the United States").
Section 430.30 - Grants procedures
42 C.F.R. § 430.30 Cited 21 times
(a)General provisions. (1) Once CMS has approved a State plan, it makes quarterly grant awards to the State to cover the Federal share of expenditures for services, training, and administration. (2) The amount of the quarterly grant is determined on the basis of information submitted by the State agency (in quarterly estimate and quarterly expenditure reports) and other pertinent documents. (b)Quarterly estimates. The Medicaid agency must submit Form CMS-37 (Medicaid Program Budget Report; Quarterly

United States ex rel, et al v. Health Alliance GC, et al

52 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that it is at least sometimes reasonable for an officer to intentionally collide with a suspect's vehicle during a pursuit

Holding that the Equal Protection Clause is implicated only when "a state legislatur[e] selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part `because of,' not merely `in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group"

Holding that an action under subsection requires a relater to allege "that the defendant intended that the false record or statement be material to the Government's decision to pay or approve the false claim"

In Moore, the Supreme Court considered “whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law.

Holding that employer's preference for another employee was not actionable unless motivated by discriminatory animus

Holding that an AKS violation may support a claim under the FCA under a false certification theory

Holding that, in cases brought under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Arlington Heights framework should guide a court's inquiry into whether a jurisdiction had a discriminatory purpose in enacting a voting change

Holding that one who contracts with a local governmental unit to work on federally funded projects can "cheat the United States" through the state intermediary

Holding that a party cannot create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment simply by contradicting his previous sworn statement

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely

Holding liable "any person" who knowingly causes false claims to be presented

Addressing Medicare's reimbursement for diagnostic laboratory services for hospital outpatients

Prohibiting the solicitation or receipt of "remuneration" in exchange for referrals

In § 3731(a), Congress apparently used the phrase "under section 3730" to mean all three § 3730 actions. § 3731(a) (a "subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a trial or hearing conducted under section 3730 of this title may be served at any place in the United States").