§Why CasetextPricing

United States Department of Justice v. Colorado Board of Pharmacy

REPLY to 1 Petition, to Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Issued

14 Cited authorities

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

    505 U.S. 504 (1992)   Cited 2,402 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express warranty was not a "requirement ... imposed under State law" because the obligation was imposed by the warrantor

  2. Crosby v. Nat'l Foreign Trade Council

    530 U.S. 363 (2000)   Cited 984 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state Burma sanctions bill conflicted with a federal Burma sanctions bill because it undermined Congress's delegation to the President of "flexible and effective authority" to adjust all sanctions in response to changing conditions

  3. Pacific Gas Elec. v. Energy Resources Comm'n

    461 U.S. 190 (1983)   Cited 1,172 times
    Holding "that the promotion of nuclear power is not to be accomplished ‘at all costs’ "

  4. United States v. Morton Salt Co.

    338 U.S. 632 (1950)   Cited 889 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although corporations do not have a right to privacy that is coextensive with that of individuals, they "may and should" have a right against having unreasonable demands levied on them by the federal government in violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment

  5. Barber v. Colorado, Department of Revenue

    562 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 270 times
    Holding that the DMV did not act with deliberate indifference to the plaintiff's request for reasonable accommodation so as to warrant an award of compensatory damages

  6. Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Edmondson

    594 F.3d 742 (10th Cir. 2010)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that a plaintiff seeking prospective injunctive relief against a public official in his official capacity must show the official has authority to perform the act

  7. Russell v. U.S.

    551 F.3d 1174 (10th Cir. 2008)   Cited 45 times
    Finding § 7425(b) preempts state law regarding extinguishment of the government's lien because federal law occupies the field

  8. U.S. v. Wagoner County Real Estate

    278 F.3d 1091 (10th Cir. 2002)   Cited 56 times
    Holding that a party could not argue on appeal that a conviction was erroneously allowed for impeachment under Fed.R.Evid. 609 because the party had preemptively elicited the evidence

  9. Center for Legal Advocacy v. Hammons

    323 F.3d 1262 (10th Cir. 2003)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that "records" includes peer-review reports and quality-assurance records

  10. United States v. Moffett

    84 F.3d 1291 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 19 times
    Stating that 21 U.S.C. § 876 "is written to give the DEA broad powers to investigate violations of federal drug laws"

  11. Section 801 - Congressional findings and declarations: controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 801   Cited 7,268 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Finding that to effectively control interstate traffic in illegal drugs it is necessary to control intrastate possession of and traffic in those substances

  12. Section 876 - Subpenas

    21 U.S.C. § 876   Cited 64 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing for judicial enforcement