32 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 269,421 times 281 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts are not required "to credit a complaint's conclusory statements without reference to its factual context"
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 282,303 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA
568 U.S. 398 (2013) Cited 3,421 times 169 Legal Analyses
Holding no standing existed where alleged injury was "based on hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."
List v. Driehaus
573 U.S. 149 (2014) Cited 2,224 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that injury was imminent because plaintiffs demonstrated that enforcement actions took place 20 to 80 times each year and thus "are not a rare occurrence"
Whitmore v. Arkansas
495 U.S. 149 (1990) Cited 2,994 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that a third party does not have "standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal"
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
413 U.S. 601 (1973) Cited 3,500 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that Oklahoma may regulate the political activities of its state employees
Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors
266 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 5,341 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that unwarranted inferences are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss
Secretary of State of Md. v. J. H. Munson Co.
467 U.S. 947 (1984) Cited 903 times
Holding that a fundraiser that contracted with charities could assert the charities’ First Amendment rights because it had third-party standing to do so
Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia
435 U.S. 829 (1978) Cited 497 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding newspaper cannot be criminally sanctioned for accurately reporting on a confidential judiciary review commission inquiry consistent with the First Amendment
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Dizol
133 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 1998) Cited 813 times
Holding that a suit seeking declaratory judgment must first pass constitutional and statutory muster as presenting a case-or-controversy before the court exercises its prudential discretion
Section 2201 - Creation of remedy
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Cited 25,223 times 63 Legal Analyses
Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment
Section 2202 - Further relief
28 U.S.C. § 2202 Cited 2,651 times
Permitting court to issue "[f]urther necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment"
Section 1806 - Use of information
50 U.S.C. § 1806 Cited 174 times 4 Legal Analyses
Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"
Section 1803 - Designation of judges
50 U.S.C. § 1803 Cited 68 times 1 Legal Analyses
(a) Court to hear applications and grant orders; record of denial; transmittal to court of review (1) The Chief Justice of the United States shall publicly designate 11 district court judges from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits of whom no fewer than 3 shall reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia who shall constitute a court which shall have jurisdiction to hear applications for and grant orders approving electronic surveillance anywhere within the United States under
Section 1861 - Definitions
50 U.S.C. § 1861 Cited 33 times 6 Legal Analyses
Providing that "[n]o person shall disclose to any other person that the [FBI] has sought or obtained tangible things pursuant to an order under" Title V of FISA

Twitter, Inc. v. Lynch et al

32 Cited authorities

Holding that courts are not required "to credit a complaint's conclusory statements without reference to its factual context"

Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

Holding no standing existed where alleged injury was "based on hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."

Holding that injury was imminent because plaintiffs demonstrated that enforcement actions took place 20 to 80 times each year and thus "are not a rare occurrence"

Holding that a third party does not have "standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal"

Holding that Oklahoma may regulate the political activities of its state employees

Holding that unwarranted inferences are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss

Holding that a fundraiser that contracted with charities could assert the charities’ First Amendment rights because it had third-party standing to do so

Holding newspaper cannot be criminally sanctioned for accurately reporting on a confidential judiciary review commission inquiry consistent with the First Amendment

Holding that a suit seeking declaratory judgment must first pass constitutional and statutory muster as presenting a case-or-controversy before the court exercises its prudential discretion

Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment

Permitting court to issue "[f]urther necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment"

Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"

Providing that "[n]o person shall disclose to any other person that the [FBI] has sought or obtained tangible things pursuant to an order under" Title V of FISA