24 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,796 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,848 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Papasan v. Allain

    478 U.S. 265 (1986)   Cited 17,448 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Ex parte Young would not support a suit against a state for ongoing liability for an alleged past breach of trust, since "continuing payment of the income from the lost corpus is essentially equivalent in economic terms to a one-time restoration of the lost corpus itself"
  4. Walker v. Prince George's County

    575 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 203 times
    Finding that a plaintiff is obliged to identify a policy or custom that caused injury
  5. Lamparello v. Falwell

    420 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 171 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "critical element" is "use of another firm's mark to capture the markholder's customers and profits" and quoting Checkpoint with approval
  6. State of Idaho Potato v. G T Terminal Pack

    425 F.3d 708 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 142 times
    Holding that Mendoza applies in a suit against a state agency
  7. Vuitton Malletier v. Haute Diggity

    507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007)   Cited 121 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "Chewy Vuiton" dog toys not to infringe on the venerable handbag maker's trademark
  8. Renaissance v. Dollar

    227 F. App'x 239 (4th Cir. 2007)   Cited 85 times
    Finding $360,000 of advertising expenditures per year and $12 million in profit unconvincing
  9. Gioconda Law Group PLLC v. Kenzie

    941 F. Supp. 2d 424 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that the "clearest case for a finding of bad faith intent to profit typically arises when a defendant 'register a domain name of an established entity in bad faith' and then 'offer to sell the domain name to the entity at an exorbitant price'"
  10. Larsen v. Terk Technologies Corp.

    151 F.3d 140 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 58 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court correctly found that a presumption of secondary meaning arose when "evidence at trial clearly showed that [defendant] intentionally copied [plaintiff's marks]"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,487 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,896 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

    15 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 15,768 times   327 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional"
  14. Section 1114 - Remedies; infringement; innocent infringement by printers and publishers

    15 U.S.C. § 1114   Cited 8,198 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant — use in commerce any reproduction . . . of a registered mark . . . in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion."
  15. Section 1117 - Recovery for violation of rights

    15 U.S.C. § 1117   Cited 5,119 times   153 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts significant discretion to award damages for a violation of § 1125
  16. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,022 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark
  17. Section 1225 - State laws as affected

    15 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 70 times

    This chapter shall not invalidate any provision of the laws of any State except insofar as there is a direct conflict between an express provision of this chapter and an express provision of State law which can not 1 be reconciled. 1 So in original. Probably should be "cannot". 15 U.S.C. § 1225 Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1038, §5, 70 Stat. 1126.