100 Cited authorities

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes

    564 U.S. 338 (2011)   Cited 6,780 times   508 Legal Analyses
    Holding in Rule 23 context that “[w]ithout some glue holding the alleged reasons for all those decisions together, it will be impossible to say that examination of all the class members' claims for relief will produce a common answer”
  2. Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor

    521 U.S. 591 (1997)   Cited 7,048 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts are "bound to enforce" Rule 23's certification requirements, even where it means decertifying a class after they had reached a settlement agreement and submitted it to the court for approval
  3. Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

    569 U.S. 27 (2013)   Cited 2,277 times   235 Legal Analyses
    Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"
  4. Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Tr. Funds

    568 U.S. 455 (2013)   Cited 1,864 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain merits questions “should not be resolved in deciding whether to certify a proposed class,” but are “properly addressed at trial or in a ruling on a summary-judgment motion”
  5. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.

    561 U.S. 247 (2010)   Cited 1,490 times   177 Legal Analyses
    Holding extraterritorial application of a statute is a merits question, not a question of subject matter jurisdiction
  6. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts

    472 U.S. 797 (1985)   Cited 1,804 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Due Process Clause of course requires that the named plaintiff at all times adequately represent the interests of the absent class members”
  7. Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.

    573 U.S. 258 (2014)   Cited 624 times   93 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants may seek to rebut the Basic presumption at the class certification stage through evidence that the misrepresentation had no price impact
  8. Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States

    406 U.S. 128 (1972)   Cited 1,635 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding bank jointly and severally liable with its employees, without explanation
  9. American Tobacco Co. Inc. v. Grinnell

    951 S.W.2d 420 (Tex. 1997)   Cited 1,118 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Texas law does not recognize claims based on a duty to act to prevent risk once prior conduct is found to be dangerous and noting that such claims "are particularly ill-suited for application to what are essentially products liability claims because they impose liability even when the manufacturer provides adequate warnings"
  10. Goodman v. Harris County

    571 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2009)   Cited 715 times
    Holding an expert may not "go beyond the scope of his expertise in giving his opinion."
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,573 times   1241 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  13. Section 16.003 - Two-Year Limitations Period

    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003   Cited 2,128 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Providing a two-year limitations period for personal injury actions
  14. Section 581-33 - [Repealed]

    Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. art. 581-33   Cited 146 times
    Providing "[n]o person may sue" under the TSA "more than five years after the sale" of the securities at issue
  15. Section 139.16 - Sales to Individual Accredited Investors

    7 Tex. Admin. Code § 139.16   Cited 2 times

    (a) In general. The State Securities Board, pursuant to the Securities Act, §5.T, exempts from the securities registration requirements of the Securities Act, §7, the offer and sale by the issuer or a registered dealer without advertising of any security to an individual accredited investor, or to any purchaser who the issuer has reasonable grounds to believe and after making reasonable inquiry shall believe to be an individual accredited investor, provided that such security is not part of the same