550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 276,716 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that statements by the defendant about the working conditions of its overseas employees were not protected by the First Amendment and could give rise to a claim for fraudulent business practices under the UCL
699 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (N.D. Cal. 2009) Cited 14 times
Finding that Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 426.30 barred a compulsory counterclaim that should have been brought in a previous debt collection case that had been dismissed without prejudice
No. C 05-3465 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2006) Cited 13 times
Holding that defendant's counterclaim for Walker Process fraud based on allegation that patent applicant disclosed prior art reference to patent examiner but did not disclose certain details about that reference failed to state a claim because allegations did not support inference of intent to deceive
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Cited 8,134 times 90 Legal Analyses
Holding liable "Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant — use in commerce any reproduction . . . of a registered mark . . . in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion."