§Why CasetextPricing

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, Llc v. Permanent Easement For et al

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

14 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,991 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,466 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

  3. Wolff v. McDonnell

    418 U.S. 539 (1974)   Cited 19,323 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that declaratory judgment as a predicate to a damages award would not be barred, but that a civil rights claim that would affect the duration of incarceration is foreclosed by Preiser

  4. Mathews v. Eldridge

    424 U.S. 319 (1976)   Cited 15,803 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a procedure based on written submissions was adequate because it included safeguards against mistake including that the agency informed the recipient of its tentative assessment and the evidence supporting it and an opportunity was then afforded the recipient to submit additional evidence "enabling him to challenge directly the accuracy of information in his file as well as the correctness of the agency's tentative conclusions"

  5. Goldberg v. Kelly

    397 U.S. 254 (1970)   Cited 4,961 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process rights attach to the deprivation of Government benefits

  6. Kelo v. City of New London

    545 U.S. 469 (2005)   Cited 528 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the condemnation of property for private economic development is a "public use"

  7. Saldana v. Kmart Corp.

    260 F.3d 228 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 1,537 times
    Holding that a "mere possibility" is insufficient as a matter of law

  8. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.

    618 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 402 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts need not strike contradictory errata revisions "if sufficiently persuasive reasons are given, if the proposed amendments truly reflect [the original testimony], or if other circumstances" justify the amendments

  9. Meyer v. Riegel Products Corp.

    720 F.2d 303 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 592 times
    Holding that equitable tolling proper where defendants deceived plaintiff into postponing filing of claim and plaintiff did not have sufficient information to make out discrimination claim until well after he learned of termination

  10. Clark v. Modern Grp. Ltd.

    9 F.3d 321 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 304 times
    Holding that when opposing summary judgment motion, "plaintiff . . . must point to admissible evidence that would be sufficient to show all elements of a prima facie case under applicable substantive law"

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,861 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 717 - Regulation of natural gas companies

    15 U.S.C. § 717   Cited 1,317 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Including “importation and exportation of natural gas in foreign commerce” under Chapter 15B through modification of § 1(b) by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109–58, 119 Stat. 594, § 311, at 685–88