§Why CasetextPricing

Tracie Thomas v. Taco Bell Corporation et al

RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 82 -- DEFENDANT TACO BELL CORP.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CHICAGO ASSOCIATIONS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT --

3 Cited authorities

  1. Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.

    211 F.3d 495 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,590 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding the same in context of forum-selection-clause prohibition in California's franchise statute

  2. Costlow v. Weeks

    790 F.2d 1486 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 561 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not err where it ordered the plaintiffs "to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed for improper venue"

  3. Saferstein v. Paul, Mardinly, Durham

    927 F. Supp. 731 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)   Cited 43 times
    Holding that where a claim is based on a breach of contract, courts considering whether venue is proper "consider a number of factors, including where the contract was negotiated or executed, where it was to be performed, and where the alleged breach occurred"