48 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,896 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,933 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept

    901 F.2d 696 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 16,518 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a cognizable gender discrimination claim could be brought by a female domestic violence victim where the victim alleged police denied protection and made misogynistic comments including that "he did not blame [the victim's] husband for hitting her, because of the way she was 'carrying on'"
  4. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,319 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be endowed with an existence independent of its contractual underpinnings. It cannot impose substantive duties or limits on the contracting parties beyond those incorporated in the specific terms of their agreement."
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.

    20 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 2,482 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"
  6. City of Cotati v. Cashman

    29 Cal.4th 69 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 1,276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the mere fact an action was filed after protected activity took place does not mean it arose from that activity"; rejecting defendant's argument that plaintiff's complaint "arose" from defendant's having previously filed lawsuit, where plaintiff's complaint "contain[ed] no reference to the [defendant's] action"
  7. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.

    26 Cal.4th 465 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,256 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Restating the same criteria for exceptions from the rule set forth in section 1714
  8. Nymark v. Heart Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n

    231 Cal.App.3d 1089 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 1,050 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, ordinarily, a financial institution acting within the scope of its conventional activities as a lender owes no duty of care to a borrower
  9. Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

    221 Cal.App.4th 49 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 412 times
    Holding loan service providers do not owe a plaintiff a duty of care when considering a loan modification application
  10. Epstein v. Washington Energy Co.

    83 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 704 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no duty to predict action of public utility commission
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,619 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,952 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 18,405 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  14. Section 1691 - Scope of prohibition

    15 U.S.C. § 1691   Cited 1,761 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Providing that it is unlawful "for any creditor to discriminate against any applicant, with respect to any aspect of a credit transaction . . . because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program"
  15. Section 1060 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1060   Cited 1,217 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a party who desires a declaration of his or her rights or duties with respect to another to ask for such a declaration, either alone or with other relief
  16. Section 17204 - Actions for Injunctions by Attorney General, District Attorney, County Counsel, and City Attorneys

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17204   Cited 995 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing a private right of action for equitable relief by those who have "lost money or property as a result of . . . unfair competition"
  17. Section 2923.6 - Agreement by mortgage servicer to implement loan modification or workout plan

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2923.6   Cited 882 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing a lender to pursue foreclosure against a defaulted borrower if "[t]he borrower accepts a written first lien loan modification, but defaults on, or otherwise breaches the borrower's obligations under, the first lien loan modification"
  18. Section 1511 - Causes excusing want of performance

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1511   Cited 222 times   14 Legal Analyses

    The want of performance of an obligation, or of an offer of performance, in whole or in part, or any delay therein, is excused by the following causes, to the extent to which they operate: 1. When such performance or offer is prevented or delayed by the act of the creditor, or by the operation of law, even though there may have been a stipulation that this shall not be an excuse; however, the parties may expressly require in a contract that the party relying on the provisions of this paragraph give

  19. Section 2924.18 - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Recordation not authorized if loan modification application pending; foreclosure prevention alternative approved

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.18   Cited 83 times
    Setting forth requirements under the HBOR once a borrower has submitted a complete first loan modification