§Why CasetextPricing

Thurston et al v. Conopco, Inc.

MOTION for Leave to File SUR-REPLY IN FURTHER OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE FOOTNOTE 7 AND RELATED ARGUMENT

2 Cited authorities

  1. Sweet v. Pfizer

    232 F.R.D. 360 (C.D. Cal. 2005)   Cited 27 times
    Finding counsel inadequate for numerous reasons, including failure to comply with federal rules, failure to submit trial plan, and quality of pleadings

  2. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,110 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems