§Why CasetextPricing

Thompson et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment

10 Cited authorities

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Barron

    269 Conn. 394 (Conn. 2004)   Cited 250 times
    Explaining that "[w]hen the words of an insurance contract are, without violence, susceptible of two interpretations, that which will sustain the claim and cover the loss must, in preference be adopted . . .

  2. R.T. Vanderbilt v. Continental

    273 Conn. 448 (Conn. 2005)   Cited 120 times
    Finding term ambiguous after review of dictionary definitions and construing term against insurer without considering extrinsic evidence

  3. Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

    205 Conn. 246 (Conn. 1987)   Cited 123 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding insurance company "liable even though no actual caving-in occurred and the structure was not rendered completely uninhabitable."

  4. Israel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

    259 Conn. 503 (Conn. 2002)   Cited 46 times
    Finding insurance provisions in irreconcilable conflict where one provision purported to allow insurer to entirely deny UIM coverage if the insured did not maintain required amount of underlying coverage and other provision stated that insurer would be entitled to a credit in the amount of the underlying insurance limits set forth in the declarations if insured did not maintain required amount of underlying coverage

  5. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Meyers

    249 Ga. App. 322 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Meyers, the Court of Appeals of Georgia held that the trial court had properly construed the insurance contract to provide coverage in light of an ambiguous, and therefore inapplicable, exclusion in the policy.

  6. S S Tobacco Candy v. Greater New York Mut. Ins. Co.

    224 Conn. 313 (Conn. 1992)   Cited 29 times

    (14511) The plaintiffs sought to recover from the defendant insurer for its alleged breach of the terms of a fire insurance policy providing for the cost of the replacement of a building that had been destroyed by fire. The defendant had paid the amount of the cash value of the destroyed building but had denied liability for the full cost of replacement because the plaintiffs had not constructed their new building on the same site. The defendant relied on a paragraph of the policy that limited replacement

  7. Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. Plantation Pipeline

    214 Ga. App. 23 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 21 times
    Concluding that a 15–year delay was reasonable because the insured did not think it was likely that the damages would exceed the ceiling of its primary policy until then

  8. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Parks

    278 Ga. App. 444 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 9 times

    A05A1992. DECIDED MARCH 24, 2006. Insurance; rental agreement. Sumter Superior Court. Before Judge Peagler. John T. Croley, Jr., for appellant. Gilbert, Harrell, Sumerford Martin, Mark D. Johnson, James L. Roberts IV, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. Auto-Owners Insurance Company was sued by its insured, Grant Stepp d/b/a Grant Stepp Equipment Company, in the underlying lawsuit to collect on an insurance claim for damage to a John Deere 690 ELC excavator owned by Stepp and leased to a third party, Robert

  9. American Aviation, Ins. v. Georgia Telco

    223 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15374. June 8, 1955. Robert L. Marchman, III, Atlanta, Ga., Crenshaw, Hansell, Ware Brandon, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. A DeJongh Franklin, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee. Before RIVES, TUTTLE and CAMERON, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves the construction of an insurance policy. Appellant issued to the appellee its policy captioned, "Credit Union Chattel Lien Non-Filing Insurance," known in the trade more simply as "non-recording" insurance, designed, subject to certain

  10. Section 45-9-4 - Purchase of insurance or indemnity contracts; self-insurance program; Hazardous Materials Liability Reserve Fund; insurer insolvency; Liability coverage to nonprofit agencies and employees contracting with state agencies

    Ga. Code § 45-9-4   Cited 6 times

    (a) When the commissioner of administrative services determines that an adequate number of agencies, boards, bureaus, commissions, departments, or authorities of this state have requested the commissioner to do so, the commissioner shall have the authority to purchase policies of liability insurance, reinsurance, or contracts of indemnity insuring or indemnifying the officers, officials, or employees of such agencies, boards, bureaus, commissions, departments, or authorities against personal liability